From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] xen: sched: fix locking of {insert, remove}_vcpu() Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:50:13 +0000 Message-ID: <565327A5.7020208@citrix.com> References: <20151104170839.20002.15551.stgit@Solace.station> <5653337E02000078000B7E17@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a0sRf-0006RW-JK for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 14:50:20 +0000 In-Reply-To: <5653337E02000078000B7E17@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , George Dunlap Cc: xen-devel , Dario Faggioli , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 23/11/15 14:40, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 23.11.15 at 15:03, wrote: >>> --- >>> Dario Faggioli (6): >>> xen: sched: fix locking of remove_vcpu() in credit1 >>> xen: sched: fix locking for insert_vcpu() in credit1 and RTDS >>> xen: sched: clarify use cases of schedule_cpu_switch() >>> xen: sched: better handle (not) inserting idle vCPUs in runqueues >>> xen: sched: get rid of the per domain vCPU list in RTDS >>> xen: sched: get rid of the per domain vCPU list in Credit2 >> >> Committers, >> >> It looks to me like this series has all the Acks and Reviews it needs >> to be checked in, but (as far as I can see) hasn't yet. Can someone >> double-check and check it in? (See the git tree above if you want to >> make it easier.) > > I've been waiting for an ack on patch 2 (and I've just checked again > and still can't find any); with this diffstat > > xen/common/sched_credit.c | 6 ++++++ > xen/common/sched_rt.c | 3 +++ > xen/common/schedule.c | 6 ++---- > > Meng's alone isn't sufficient afaict. I've once made an attempt to > commit later patches in this series, but failed and then didn't want > to waste time retrying. What are the rules again, then? Dario is a scheduler maintainer, and Meng is an established contributor. I thought that was enough. -George