From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41009) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1TKr-0002YT-3B for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 01:13:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1TKl-0007nj-T6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 01:13:45 -0500 Received: from [2a03:4000:1::4e2f:c7ac:d] (port=46579 helo=v220110690675601.yourvserver.net) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1TKl-0007nY-Mx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 01:13:39 -0500 Message-ID: <5655518F.20405@weilnetz.de> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:13:35 +0100 From: Stefan Weil MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1447875909-14632-1-git-send-email-Andrew.Baumann@microsoft.com> <56552493.7040001@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <56552493.7040001@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] net/tap-win32 bugfixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jason Wang , Andrew Baumann , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" Am 25.11.2015 um 04:01 schrieb Jason Wang: >=20 >=20 > On 11/25/2015 07:36 AM, Andrew Baumann wrote: >> Ping? >> >> Jason, I know you planned to leave this for a few days... I just wante= d to make sure it isn't forgotten :) >> >> Thanks, >> Andrew >=20 > Thanks for working on this. I would expect Stefan to review v2 (since h= e > reviewed v1). >=20 > Stefan, could you please review v2? Hi Jason, patch 1/2 already contains my Reviewed-by, but I cannot say much about patch 2/2, simply because I cannot test it. As the changes in 2/2 look plausible, I suggest nevertheless to apply both patches for QEMU 2.5. What would be the correct way to indicate this? Acked-by: Stefan Weil ? Feel free to add it to patch 2/2 if needed. Kind regards, Stefan