All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: dvyukov@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>, stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TTY: n_gsm, fix false positive WARN_ON
Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 14:32:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56555613.1040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448384067-27300-1-git-send-email-jslaby@suse.cz>

hi, Jiri
	This warning should blame on commit 5a640967 ("tty/n_gsm.c: fix a memory leak in gsmld_open()"). When gsm driver failed to activate one mux,there is memory leak. So I call this ->cleanup() to do the cleanup work. Seems I did not consider all cases.

I have one confusion. As there is field gsm->num to store the index of gsm_mux[]. so in gsm_cleanup_mux(), why we still use for-loop to find this mux?

In error handle path, for example, the call trace in this patch, as we failed to activate it and the
gsm->num is invalid(and the value is 0). we can just modify the codes like below:

if(gsm_mux[gsm->num] == gsm)
....other work
else
	return;

I think it would work, and the logic is correct. Or I just miss something important?

thanks
xinhui

On 2015/11/25 00:54, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> Dmitry reported, that the current cleanup code in n_gsm can trigger a
> warning:
> WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 24238 at drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2048 gsm_cleanup_mux+0x166/0x6b0()
> ...
> Call Trace:
> ...
>   [<ffffffff81247ab9>] warn_slowpath_null+0x29/0x30 kernel/panic.c:490
>   [<ffffffff828d0456>] gsm_cleanup_mux+0x166/0x6b0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2048
>   [<ffffffff828d4d87>] gsmld_open+0x5b7/0x7a0 drivers/tty/n_gsm.c:2386
>   [<ffffffff828b9078>] tty_ldisc_open.isra.2+0x78/0xd0 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:447
>   [<ffffffff828b973a>] tty_set_ldisc+0x1ca/0xa70 drivers/tty/tty_ldisc.c:567
>   [<     inline     >] tiocsetd drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2650
>   [<ffffffff828a14ea>] tty_ioctl+0xb2a/0x2140 drivers/tty/tty_io.c:2883
> ...
>
> But this is a legal path when open fails to find a space in the
> gsm_mux array and tries to clean up. So make it a standard test
> instead of a warning.
>
> Reported-by: "Dmitry Vyukov" <dvyukov@google.com>
> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+bHQbAB68VFi7Romcs-Z9ZW3kQRvcq+BvHH1oa5NcAdLA@mail.gmail.com
> Fixes: e1eaea46bb40 ("tty: n_gsm line discipline")
> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz>
> ---
>   drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 4 +++-
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index c3fe026d3168..9aff37186246 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -2045,7 +2045,9 @@ static void gsm_cleanup_mux(struct gsm_mux *gsm)
>   		}
>   	}
>   	spin_unlock(&gsm_mux_lock);
> -	WARN_ON(i == MAX_MUX);
> +	/* open failed before registering => nothing to do */
> +	if (i == MAX_MUX)
> +		return;
>
>   	/* In theory disconnecting DLCI 0 is sufficient but for some
>   	   modems this is apparently not the case. */
>


  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-25  6:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-24 10:35 WARNING in gsm_cleanup_mux Dmitry Vyukov
2015-11-24 16:54 ` [PATCH] TTY: n_gsm, fix false positive WARN_ON Jiri Slaby
2015-11-25  6:32   ` xinhui [this message]
2015-11-25  9:56     ` Jiri Slaby
2015-11-25 10:32       ` xinhui
2016-02-28 16:16         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-03-01  5:01           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-03-01  9:03             ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-03-01 17:15               ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2016-03-22 17:09                 ` Jiri Slaby

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56555613.1040502@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=alan@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.