From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39653) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Ykw-0006L6-G4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:01:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Ykr-0002Cf-Gk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:01:02 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]:33931) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a1Ykr-0002BZ-AP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 07:00:57 -0500 Received: by wmvv187 with SMTP id v187so253531411wmv.1 for ; Wed, 25 Nov 2015 04:00:56 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <1448448749-1332-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com> <20151125130156-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <5655A2EF.2070102@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2015 13:00:47 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20151125130156-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fix regression in object creation order List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , "Daniel P. Berrange" Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Marc-Andr=c3=a9_Lureau?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 25/11/2015 12:02, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 10:52:27AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> This fixes the regression in object creation warning identified >> by Paolo here: >> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-11/msg04994.html >> >> It provides an alternative fix to the original problem, by >> simply removing the warning message in question. > > Paolo, pls merge this if you see fit. > >> Daniel P. Berrange (2): >> Revert "exec: silence hugetlbfs warning under qtest" >> exec: remove warning about mempath and hugetlbfs >> >> exec.c | 6 ------ >> vl.c | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- >> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> 2.5.0 Yes, will do. Paolo