From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/3] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work - part2
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 15:31:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565717A7.6030109@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151126211331.92fd33fae0be8225ab64d577@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On 26/11/2015 13:13, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> Guests worked normally in shadow paging mode (ept=0) on my test machine.
>
> Please check if the first two patches reflect what you meant correctly.
Yes, they do!
Thanks,
Paolo
> Takuya Yoshikawa (3):
> [1] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page()
> [2] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk()
> [3] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove unused parameter parent_pte from kvm_mmu_get_page()
>
> arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c | 70 +++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 10 +++----
> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 54 deletions(-)
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 12:13 [PATCH V4 0/3] KVM: x86: MMU: Clean up x86's mmu code for future work - part2 Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-26 12:14 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: x86: MMU: Move parent_pte handling from kvm_mmu_get_page() to link_shadow_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-26 12:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM: x86: MMU: Use for_each_rmap_spte macro instead of pte_list_walk() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-26 12:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: MMU: Remove unused parameter parent_pte from kvm_mmu_get_page() Takuya Yoshikawa
2015-11-26 14:31 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565717A7.6030109@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=yoshikawa_takuya_b1@lab.ntt.co.jp \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.