From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 5F8A3E00855; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:43:27 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [192.55.52.88 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38881E00343 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 09:43:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2015 09:43:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,347,1444719600"; d="scan'208,217";a="860030070" Received: from lsandov1-mob1-linux.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.5.40]) ([10.219.5.40]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2015 09:43:20 -0800 To: Dariusz Pelowski , yocto@yoctoproject.org References: From: Leonardo Sandoval Message-ID: <56574564.7030909@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:46:12 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Failing devshell X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:43:27 -0000 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070307020500000406060004" --------------070307020500000406060004 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > Is it acceptable solution? Could you apply attached patch? > A less intrusive change would be to check if the output of the --version command contains the word 'GNOME' (either using the 'in' build-in operation or string.find). This is done in the same function you modified in your previous patch. > Thanks, > Dariusz > > > --------------070307020500000406060004 Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is it acceptable solution? Could you apply attached patch?


A less intrusive change would be to check if the output of the --version command contains the word 'GNOME' (either using the 'in' build-in operation or string.find). This is done in the same function you modified in your previous patch.

Thanks,
Dariusz




--------------070307020500000406060004--