From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 62FF3E00855; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:30:42 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [134.134.136.65 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA861E00343 for ; Thu, 26 Nov 2015 11:30:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2015 11:30:21 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,347,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="695051909" Received: from lsandov1-mob1-linux.zpn.intel.com (HELO [10.219.5.40]) ([10.219.5.40]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Nov 2015 11:30:21 -0800 To: Dariusz Pelowski , yocto@yoctoproject.org References: <56574564.7030909@linux.intel.com> <56575922.904@gmail.com> From: Leonardo Sandoval Message-ID: <56575E79.3050904@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:33:13 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <56575922.904@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Failing devshell X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 19:30:42 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit You are right. have you done some testing in non-gnome terminals using your patch? On 11/26/2015 01:10 PM, Dariusz Pelowski wrote: > >> A less intrusive change would be to check if the output of the >> --version command contains the word 'GNOME' (either using the 'in' >> build-in operation or string.find). This is done in the same function >> you modified in your previous patch. >> >> > > Greping gnome-terminal translations we can find that word "GNOME" > doesn't exists in all languages: > am.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > am.po-msgstr "የኖም ተርሚናል" > -- > ar.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ar.po-msgstr "طرفيّة جنوم" > -- > dz.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > dz.po-msgstr "ཇི་ནོམ་ ཊར་མི་ནཱལ་།" > -- > en@shaw.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > en@shaw.po-msgstr "·𐑜𐑯𐑴𐑥 𐑑𐑻𐑥𐑦𐑯𐑩𐑤" > -- > fa.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > fa.po-msgstr "پایانه‌ی گنوم" > -- > fi.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > fi.po-msgstr "Gnomen pääte" > -- > hi.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > hi.po-msgstr "गनोम टर्मिनल" > -- > hy.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > hy.po-msgstr "ԳՆՈՄ Տերմինալ" > -- > ka.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ka.po-msgstr "გნომ ტერმინალი" > -- > ko.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ko.po-msgstr "그놈 터미널" > -- > mai.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > mai.po-msgstr "गनोम टर्मिनल" > -- > ml.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ml.po-msgstr "ഗ്നോം ടെര്‍മിനല്‍" > -- > mn.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > mn.po-msgstr "ГНОМЕ-Терминал" > -- > ne.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ne.po-msgstr "जिनोम टर्मिनल" > -- > ps.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ps.po-msgstr "جنومي پايالی" > -- > rw.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > rw.po-msgstr "" > -- > si.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > si.po-msgstr "ග්නෝම් අග්‍රය" > -- > sr.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > sr.po-msgstr "Гномов терминал" > -- > sr@latin.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > sr@latin.po-msgstr "Gnomov terminal" > -- > ta.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ta.po-msgstr "கனோம் முனையம்" > -- > te.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > te.po-msgstr "గ్నోమ్ టెర్మినల్" > -- > ug.po:msgid "GNOME Terminal" > ug.po-msgstr "گىنوم تېرمىنال" > > Can we stay with setting default locale? > > Thanks, > Dariusz >