From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CDDE014FA for ; Tue, 14 May 2013 02:22:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2013 02:22:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,669,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="336887707" Received: from unknown (HELO helios.localnet) ([10.255.12.153]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 14 May 2013 02:22:55 -0700 From: Paul Eggleton To: Felix01 Fischer , Nitin A Kamble Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 10:22:53 +0100 Message-ID: <5657638.Np3iF1lsb7@helios> Organization: Intel Corporation User-Agent: KMail/4.10.2 (Linux/3.8.0-19-generic; KDE/4.10.2; i686; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: Confused which layers are needed for meta-intel/meta-crownbay X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 09:22:56 -0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Hi Felix, On Tuesday 14 May 2013 09:22:53 Felix01 Fischer wrote: > I'm currently trying to build a booting core-image-sato image with MACHINE > ?="crownbay". I'm using poky 9.0.0 and meta-intel (dylan branch). > > I've discovered something which confuses me: > > First meta-intel/meta-crownbay/README states that it is to be used with > the openembedded.org bitbake and openembedded-core layer (both on branch > master). Isn't this opposite in using yocto (as both provide bitbake) ? It's not the opposite, it's the same. Poky is composed of openembedded-core, bitbake, yocto-docs and a few other bits and pieces; so you can either use poky here or openembedded-core + bitbake. > Second meta-intel/meta-crownbay/README.sources points to yocto-1.3 (Line > 10). This is an oversight. Nitin, can you please correct this or avoid having the fixed version URL in the document at all? > Is it possible that these layers aren't ready for yocto 1.4 despite being > packaged as "1.4-final", "1.4" and "danny-9.0.0"? No, I think this is just a case where the URL hasn't been updated in the README.sources file. Cheers, Paul -- Paul Eggleton Intel Open Source Technology Centre