All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
To: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>,
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] rpm: fix for N32 MIPS64
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 09:31:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5657B25A.30901@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56571E00.2040503@windriver.com>


Thanks, updated in the repo:

   git://git.openembedded.org/openembedded-core-contrib rbt/n32


commit b817f6b15376e9fc95c6ab50c6dae825a6c81ce6
Author: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Date:   Thu Nov 26 02:05:17 2015 -0800

     rpm: fix for N32 MIPS64

     Issue: LIN8-1726

     Older versions of 'file' reported it as N32 MIPS32, newer versions are
     reporting it as N32 MIPS64. So we should check for both.

     $ file image/usr/bin/getent
     getent: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, N32 MIPS64 [snip]

     (LOCAL REV: NOT UPSTREAM) -- Sent to oe-core on 20151126

     Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>

diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..99cdf85
--- /dev/null
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From e864ec768ad0736bddcd951b2db8fe12c7b30e4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
+Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:36:40 -0800
+Subject: [PATCH] lib/rpmfc.c: fix for N32 MIPS64
+
+Older versions of 'file' reported it as N32 MIPS32, newer versions are
+reporting it as N32 MIPS64. So we should check for both.
+
+$ file image/usr/bin/getent
+getent: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, N32 MIPS64 [snip]
+
+Upstream-Status: Pending
+
+Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
+---
+ lib/rpmfc.c |    1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+diff --git a/lib/rpmfc.c b/lib/rpmfc.c
+index fde00c7..c9c82bf 100644
+--- a/lib/rpmfc.c
++++ b/lib/rpmfc.c
+@@ -575,6 +575,7 @@ static struct rpmfcTokens_s rpmfcTokens[] = {
+   { " not stripped",          RPMFC_NOTSTRIPPED },
+   { " archive",                       RPMFC_ARCHIVE },
+
++  { "MIPS, N32 MIPS64",               RPMFC_ELFMIPSN32|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
+   { "MIPS, N32 MIPS32",               RPMFC_ELFMIPSN32|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
+   { "ELF 32-bit",             RPMFC_ELF32|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
+   { "ELF 64-bit",             RPMFC_ELF64|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
+--
+1.7.9.5
+
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb
index 951b251..0d14728 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb
@@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ SRC_URI = "cvs://anonymous@rpm5.org/cvs;tag=rpm-5_4;module=rpm \
            file://rpm-rpmpgp-fix.patch \
            file://rpm-disable-Wno-override-init.patch \
            file://rpm-realpath.patch \
+          file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
           "

  # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging
diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb 
b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
index 3930410..8e1d3cb 100644
--- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
+++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ SRC_URI = 
"http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.14-0.20131024.src.rpm;e
            file://rpm-opendb-before-verifyscript-to-avoid-null-point.patch \
            file://configure.ac-check-for-both-gpg2-and-gpg.patch \
            file://0001-define-EM_AARCH64.patch \
+          file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
           "

  # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging


// Robert

On 11/26/2015 10:58 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> On 11/26/15 4:35 AM, Robert Yang wrote:
>> It is 'N32 MIPS64', not 'N32 MIPS32' as command file shows:
>> $ file image/usr/bin/getent
>> getent: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, N32 MIPS64 [snip]
>>
>> And "rpm -qp --filecolor" was wrong (it was 1, but should be 4), which
>> caused multilib installation error.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>> ---
>>   .../rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch   |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb           |    1 +
>>   meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb            |    1 +
>>   3 files changed, 36 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch
>>
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..a516574
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>> +From 16dc683aa50be9789d1674734b06a8a955ff22ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> +From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>> +Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 01:36:40 -0800
>> +Subject: [PATCH] lib/rpmfc.c: fix for N32 MIPS64
>> +
>> +It is 'N32 MIPS64', not 'N32 MIPS32' as command file shows:
>> +$ file image/usr/bin/getent
>> +getent: ELF 32-bit MSB executable, MIPS, N32 MIPS64 [snip]
>> +
>> +And "rpm -qp --filecolor" was wrong (it was 1, but should be 4).
>> +
>> +Upstream-Status: Pending
>> +
>> +Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>> +---
>> + lib/rpmfc.c |    2 +-
>> + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> +
>> +diff --git a/lib/rpmfc.c b/lib/rpmfc.c
>> +index fde00c7..49779f8 100644
>> +--- a/lib/rpmfc.c
>> ++++ b/lib/rpmfc.c
>> +@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static struct rpmfcTokens_s rpmfcTokens[] = {
>> +   { " not stripped",		RPMFC_NOTSTRIPPED },
>> +   { " archive",			RPMFC_ARCHIVE },
>> +
>> +-  { "MIPS, N32 MIPS32",		RPMFC_ELFMIPSN32|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
>> ++  { "MIPS, N32 MIPS64",		RPMFC_ELFMIPSN32|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
>
> I mentioned this to Robert off the list as well.  But I believe we need to look
> for both N32 MIPS32 and N32 MIPS64 here.
>
> Older versions of file 'magic' (which is what rpmfc.c is looking at) reported
> 'N32 MIPS32', while it appears newer versions report 'N32 MIPS64'.  So checking
> both is my recommendation.  But this does fix an issue where you can't install
> both N32 and O32 multilibs without ELF collisions.
>
> --Mark
>
>> +   { "ELF 32-bit",		RPMFC_ELF32|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
>> +   { "ELF 64-bit",		RPMFC_ELF64|RPMFC_INCLUDE },
>> +
>> +--
>> +1.7.9.5
>> +
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb
>> index 951b251..0d14728 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4+cvs.bb
>> @@ -111,6 +111,7 @@ SRC_URI = "cvs://anonymous@rpm5.org/cvs;tag=rpm-5_4;module=rpm \
>>   	   file://rpm-rpmpgp-fix.patch \
>>   	   file://rpm-disable-Wno-override-init.patch \
>>   	   file://rpm-realpath.patch \
>> +	   file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
>>   	  "
>>
>>   # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging
>> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
>> index 3930410..8e1d3cb 100644
>> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
>> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
>> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.14-0.20131024.src.rpm;e
>>   	   file://rpm-opendb-before-verifyscript-to-avoid-null-point.patch \
>>   	   file://configure.ac-check-for-both-gpg2-and-gpg.patch \
>>   	   file://0001-define-EM_AARCH64.patch \
>> +	   file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
>>   	  "
>>
>>   # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging
>>
>


      reply	other threads:[~2015-11-27  1:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-26 10:35 [PATCH 0/1] rpm: fix for N32 MIPS64 Robert Yang
2015-11-26 10:35 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Robert Yang
2015-11-26 14:58   ` Mark Hatle
2015-11-27  1:31     ` Robert Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5657B25A.30901@windriver.com \
    --to=liezhi.yang@windriver.com \
    --cc=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.