From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux@arm.linux.org.uk,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource: ti-32k: convert to platform device
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:10:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5658B8B2.5030505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9kgcz1k.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com>
Hi Felipe,
On 11/20/2015 08:21 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
>> Since system clocksource is finally selected by Clocksource core at
>> fs_initcall stage during boot there are no reasons to initialize
>> ti_32k_timer at early boot stages. Hence, ti_32k_timer can be
>> converted to use platform device/driver model and its PM can be
>> implemented using PM runtime which is common for OMAP devices.
>>
>> Platform specific initialization code has to be disabled once as
>> ti_32k_timer is converted to platform device - otherwise OMAP platform
>> code will generate boot warnings.
>>
>> After this change, all counter_32k's platform code can be removed
>> once all OMAP boards will be converted to DT.
>>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> ---
[...]
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver ti_32k_driver __initdata = {
>> + .probe = ti_32k_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "ti_32k_timer",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ti_32k_of_table),
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init ti_32k_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&ti_32k_driver);
>> }
>> -CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(ti_32k_timer, "ti,omap-counter32k",
>> - ti_32k_timer_init);
>> +
>> +subsys_initcall(ti_32k_init);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Mundt");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Juha Yrjölä");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("OMAP2 32k Timer");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:ti_32k_timer");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> this will break clksource_of_init(), right ? Eventually, we want that to
> be the only thing called by our .init_time method. I'll leave it to Tony
> to decide, but IMO this is not a good path forward for timers.
>
Yeh :(. I did additional tests, and, unfortunately, this can't be used as is.
But not because of clocksource_of_init() which will just produce boot warning.
It can't be done because of sched_clock_register() which is expected to be
called during early boot time only and with disabled IRQs.
It was so tempting to try :)
Thanks for your comment.
--
regards,
-grygorii
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: grygorii.strashko@ti.com (Grygorii Strashko)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH] clocksource: ti-32k: convert to platform device
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:10:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5658B8B2.5030505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9kgcz1k.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com>
Hi Felipe,
On 11/20/2015 08:21 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
>> Since system clocksource is finally selected by Clocksource core at
>> fs_initcall stage during boot there are no reasons to initialize
>> ti_32k_timer at early boot stages. Hence, ti_32k_timer can be
>> converted to use platform device/driver model and its PM can be
>> implemented using PM runtime which is common for OMAP devices.
>>
>> Platform specific initialization code has to be disabled once as
>> ti_32k_timer is converted to platform device - otherwise OMAP platform
>> code will generate boot warnings.
>>
>> After this change, all counter_32k's platform code can be removed
>> once all OMAP boards will be converted to DT.
>>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> ---
[...]
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver ti_32k_driver __initdata = {
>> + .probe = ti_32k_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "ti_32k_timer",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ti_32k_of_table),
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init ti_32k_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&ti_32k_driver);
>> }
>> -CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(ti_32k_timer, "ti,omap-counter32k",
>> - ti_32k_timer_init);
>> +
>> +subsys_initcall(ti_32k_init);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Mundt");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Juha Yrj?l?");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("OMAP2 32k Timer");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:ti_32k_timer");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> this will break clksource_of_init(), right ? Eventually, we want that to
> be the only thing called by our .init_time method. I'll leave it to Tony
> to decide, but IMO this is not a good path forward for timers.
>
Yeh :(. I did additional tests, and, unfortunately, this can't be used as is.
But not because of clocksource_of_init() which will just produce boot warning.
It can't be done because of sched_clock_register() which is expected to be
called during early boot time only and with disabled IRQs.
It was so tempting to try :)
Thanks for your comment.
--
regards,
-grygorii
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] clocksource: ti-32k: convert to platform device
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:10:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5658B8B2.5030505@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87h9kgcz1k.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com>
Hi Felipe,
On 11/20/2015 08:21 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
>> Since system clocksource is finally selected by Clocksource core at
>> fs_initcall stage during boot there are no reasons to initialize
>> ti_32k_timer at early boot stages. Hence, ti_32k_timer can be
>> converted to use platform device/driver model and its PM can be
>> implemented using PM runtime which is common for OMAP devices.
>>
>> Platform specific initialization code has to be disabled once as
>> ti_32k_timer is converted to platform device - otherwise OMAP platform
>> code will generate boot warnings.
>>
>> After this change, all counter_32k's platform code can be removed
>> once all OMAP boards will be converted to DT.
>>
>> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
>> ---
[...]
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver ti_32k_driver __initdata = {
>> + .probe = ti_32k_probe,
>> + .driver = {
>> + .name = "ti_32k_timer",
>> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(ti_32k_of_table),
>> + }
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int __init ti_32k_init(void)
>> +{
>> + return platform_driver_register(&ti_32k_driver);
>> }
>> -CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE(ti_32k_timer, "ti,omap-counter32k",
>> - ti_32k_timer_init);
>> +
>> +subsys_initcall(ti_32k_init);
>> +
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Paul Mundt");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Juha Yrjölä");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("OMAP2 32k Timer");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:ti_32k_timer");
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
> this will break clksource_of_init(), right ? Eventually, we want that to
> be the only thing called by our .init_time method. I'll leave it to Tony
> to decide, but IMO this is not a good path forward for timers.
>
Yeh :(. I did additional tests, and, unfortunately, this can't be used as is.
But not because of clocksource_of_init() which will just produce boot warning.
It can't be done because of sched_clock_register() which is expected to be
called during early boot time only and with disabled IRQs.
It was so tempting to try :)
Thanks for your comment.
--
regards,
-grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-27 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-20 17:22 [RFC PATCH] clocksource: ti-32k: convert to platform device Grygorii Strashko
2015-11-20 17:22 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-11-20 17:22 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-11-20 18:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-20 18:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-20 18:21 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-11-27 20:10 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2015-11-27 20:10 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-11-27 20:10 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-11-30 16:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-11-30 16:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-01 15:08 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 15:08 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 15:08 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 16:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-01 16:07 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-01 17:12 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 17:12 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 17:12 ` Grygorii Strashko
2015-12-01 17:24 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-01 17:24 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5658B8B2.5030505@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.