From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Loic Dachary Subject: RFC: teuthology field in commit messages Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:56:02 +0100 Message-ID: <5659CE92.4000203@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5gBWTQvA41EEP20DCBrp5NtVl0xNuVngu" Return-path: Received: from mail2.dachary.org ([91.121.57.175]:40612 "EHLO smtp.dmail.dachary.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752097AbbK1P4K (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Nov 2015 10:56:10 -0500 Received: from [10.9.0.6] (unknown [10.0.2.28]) by smtp.dmail.dachary.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04595420AC for ; Sat, 28 Nov 2015 16:56:03 +0100 (CET) Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Ceph Development This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --5gBWTQvA41EEP20DCBrp5NtVl0xNuVngu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ceph, An optional teuthology field could be added to a commit message like so: teuthology: --suite rbd to state that this commit should be tested with the rbd suite. It could b= e parsed by bots and humans. It would make it easy and cost effective to run partial teuthology suites= automatically on pull requests. What do you think ? --=20 Lo=C3=AFc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre --5gBWTQvA41EEP20DCBrp5NtVl0xNuVngu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlZZzpIACgkQ8dLMyEl6F22++gCeOyALaFtSiKmSrTyYxJKob1UN aa4AoK0unlDlmKO/x/qijYdcnBfmy+nr =2Sl4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5gBWTQvA41EEP20DCBrp5NtVl0xNuVngu--