From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] iio: chemical: vz89x: rework i2c transfer reading
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 14:27:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565B0B41.3080203@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1448557874-3812-2-git-send-email-mranostay@gmail.com>
On 26/11/15 17:11, Matt Ranostay wrote:
> Add an optimized i2c transfer reading function, and fallback
> to racey smbus transfers if client->adapter doesn't support this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@gmail.com>
Few comments inline but nothing that stops me applying this.
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git - initially pushed out as testing.
Note this branch will rebase soonish so don't base anything much on it!
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
> index 11e59a5..c3367aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/chemical/vz89x.c
> @@ -34,8 +34,9 @@
> struct vz89x_data {
> struct i2c_client *client;
> struct mutex lock;
> - unsigned long last_update;
> + int (*xfer)(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd);
>
> + unsigned long last_update;
> u8 buffer[VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE];
> };
>
> @@ -100,27 +101,60 @@ static int vz89x_measurement_is_valid(struct vz89x_data *data)
> return !!(data->buffer[VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE - 1] > 0);
> }
>
> -static int vz89x_get_measurement(struct vz89x_data *data)
> +static int vz89x_i2c_xfer(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd)
> {
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
> + struct i2c_msg msg[2];
> int ret;
> - int i;
> + u8 buf[3] = { cmd, 0, 0};
>
> - /* sensor can only be polled once a second max per datasheet */
> - if (!time_after(jiffies, data->last_update + HZ))
> - return 0;
> + msg[0].addr = client->addr;
> + msg[0].flags = client->flags;
> + msg[0].len = 3;
> + msg[0].buf = (char *) &buf;
> +
> + msg[1].addr = client->addr;
> + msg[1].flags = client->flags | I2C_M_RD;
> + msg[1].len = VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE;
> + msg[1].buf = (char *) &data->buffer;
> +
> + ret = i2c_transfer(client->adapter, msg, 2);
>
> - ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(data->client,
> - VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT, 0);
> + return (ret == VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE) ? 0 : ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vz89x_smbus_xfer(struct vz89x_data *data, u8 cmd)
> +{
> + struct i2c_client *client = data->client;
I wouldn't have bothered with the local variable, but it's just
a matter of personal taste so lets leave it be!
> + int ret;
> + int i;
> +
> + ret = i2c_smbus_write_word_data(client, cmd, 0);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
>
> for (i = 0; i < VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT_SIZE; i++) {
> - ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(data->client);
> + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte(client);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> data->buffer[i] = ret;
> }
>
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vz89x_get_measurement(struct vz89x_data *data)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* sensor can only be polled once a second max per datasheet */
> + if (!time_after(jiffies, data->last_update + HZ))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = data->xfer(data, VZ89X_REG_MEASUREMENT);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> ret = vz89x_measurement_is_valid(data);
> if (ret)
> return -EAGAIN;
> @@ -204,15 +238,19 @@ static int vz89x_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> struct vz89x_data *data;
>
> - if (!i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA |
> - I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> indio_dev = devm_iio_device_alloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*data));
> if (!indio_dev)
> return -ENOMEM;
> -
THis is a random white space change that snuck in - hardly crucial but would
have been cleaner if this hadn't been in the patch.
> data = iio_priv(indio_dev);
> +
> + if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter, I2C_FUNC_I2C))
> + data->xfer = vz89x_i2c_xfer;
> + else if (i2c_check_functionality(client->adapter,
> + I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_WORD_DATA | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_BYTE))
> + data->xfer = vz89x_smbus_xfer;
> + else
> + return -ENOTSUPP;
> +
> i2c_set_clientdata(client, indio_dev);
> data->client = client;
> data->last_update = jiffies - HZ;
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-29 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-26 17:11 [PATCH v2 0/1] iio: chemical: vz89x: rework i2c transfer reading Matt Ranostay
2015-11-26 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] " Matt Ranostay
2015-11-29 14:27 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2015-12-02 4:59 ` Matt Ranostay
2015-12-02 18:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2015-12-02 19:09 ` Matt Ranostay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565B0B41.3080203@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mranostay@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.