From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] scsi_transport_fc: Introduce scsi_host_{get,put}() Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:37:39 -0800 Message-ID: <565C8963.7050009@sandisk.com> References: <564F910E.9070306@sandisk.com> <564F9190.5090103@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail-bl2on0065.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.169.65]:21246 "EHLO na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751484AbbK3Rhp (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Nov 2015 12:37:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: James Bottomley , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , James Smart On 11/30/2015 09:34 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Bart" == Bart Van Assche writes: > > Bart, > > Bart> Use scsi_host_{get,put}() instead of open-coding these functions. > Bart> Compile-tested only. > > Do you want me to queue this as a general cleanup for 4.5 (independently > of the leak patch)? Hello Martin, That would be appreciated. Thanks, Bart.