From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Vrabel Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] evtchn: don't reuse ports that are still "busy" Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 15:57:03 +0000 Message-ID: <565DC34F.5020100@citrix.com> References: <1448981980-14696-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <565DD00702000078000BAE4A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a3nIi-0006XI-QN for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 15:57:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: <565DD00702000078000BAE4A@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich , David Vrabel Cc: Ross Lagerwall , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 01/12/15 15:51, Jan Beulich wrote: > > I realize there's a lot of u32-s for port numbers, but I think we > should really get used to using evtchn_port_t for those. I checked the type in struct evtchn (which is u32) but evtchn_port_t is better. Thanks. David