From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Sander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
david.vrabel@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] linux 4.4 Regression: 100% cpu usage on idle pv guest under Xen with single vcpu.
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2015 17:47:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565E239E.8070507@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454b921884da94b7c1e9f434c13eb4a@eikelenboom.it>
On 11/30/2015 05:55 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 2015-11-30 23:54, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
>> On 11/30/2015 04:46 PM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>> On 2015-11-30 22:45, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 04:47:43PM +0100, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have just tested a 4.4-rc2 kernel (current linus tree) + the tip
>>>>> tree
>>>>> pulled on top.
>>>>>
>>>>> Running this kernel under Xen on PV-guests with multiple vcpus
>>>>> goes well (on
>>>>> idle < 10% cpu usage),
>>>>> but a guest with only a single vcpu doesn't idle at all, it seems
>>>>> a kworker
>>>>> thread is stuck:
>>>>> root 569 98.0 0.0 0 0 ? R 16:02 12:47
>>>>> [kworker/0:1]
>>>>>
>>>>> Running a 4.3 kernel works fine with a single vpcu, bisecting
>>>>> would probably
>>>>> quite painful since there were some breakages this merge window
>>>>> with respect
>>>>> to Xen pv-guests.
>>>>>
>>>>> There are some differences in the diff's from booting a 4.3,
>>>>> 4.4-single,
>>>>> 4.4-multi cpu boot:
>>>>
>>>> Boris has been tracking a bunch of them. I am attaching the latest
>>>> set of
>>>> patches I've to carry on top of v4.4-rc3.
>>>
>>> Hi Konrad,
>>>
>>> i will test those, see if it fixes all my issues and report back
>>
>> They shouldn't help you ;-( (and I just saw a message from you
>> confirming this)
>>
>> The first one fixes a 32-bit bug (on bare metal too). The second fixes
>> a fatal bug for 32-bit PV guests. The other two are code
>> improvements/cleanup.
>
> One of these patches also fixes a bug i was having with a
> pci-passthrough device in
> a HVM that wasn't working (depending on which dom0-kernel i was using
> (4.3 or 4.4)),
> but didn't report yet.
>
> Fingers crossed but i think this pv-guest single vcpu issue is the
> last i'm troubled by for now ;)
I could not reproduce this, including with your kernel config file.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-01 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-28 15:47 linux 4.4 Regression: 100% cpu usage on idle pv guest under Xen with single vcpu Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 21:45 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2015-11-30 21:46 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 21:46 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 22:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-30 22:55 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 22:47 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2015-12-01 23:00 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:30 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:41 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:41 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:44 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:44 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 10:04 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 10:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:30 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:19 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:00 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 22:55 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:51 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 22:51 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-01 23:05 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-12-01 23:05 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-30 22:54 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-30 22:47 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
2015-11-30 22:47 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 14:15 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-12-02 14:15 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-02 14:55 ` David Vrabel
2015-12-02 14:55 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2015-12-02 17:30 ` Sander Eikelenboom
2015-12-02 17:30 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-14 19:48 Eric Shelton
2015-12-14 21:07 ` [Xen-devel] " Sander Eikelenboom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565E239E.8070507@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@eikelenboom.it \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.