diff for duplicates of <565EC2E8.9010508@redhat.com> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 90b925b..074006e 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ On 02/12/2015 06:13, Ming Lin wrote: -> On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote: +> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme? >> >> What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 53bad35..4a65303 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -7,15 +7,21 @@ "ref\01448987171.3041.2.camel@hasee\0" "ref\0998355860.30506151.1448989146641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com\0" "ref\01449033191.3041.11.camel@hasee\0" - "From\0pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)\0" - "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0" + "From\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0" "Date\0Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:07:36 +0100\0" + "To\0Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>\0" + "Cc\0qemu-devel@nongnu.org" + Rob Nelson <rlnelson@google.com> + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> + linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org + " virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "\n" "\n" "On 02/12/2015 06:13, Ming Lin wrote:\n" - "> On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" + "> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" ">>> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme?\n" ">>\n" ">> What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported\n" @@ -69,4 +75,4 @@ "\n" Paolo -7b2d971264b579bb3a9970290f13a6d6b2c0198255b934ce1a2374cc974ca526 +010667bea830933df2495e516efcc1b5d9144dbd8bc81b379c1f8e051ea84dbf
diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N2/1.txt index 90b925b..074006e 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N2/1.txt @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ On 02/12/2015 06:13, Ming Lin wrote: -> On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote: +> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme? >> >> What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N2/content_digest index 53bad35..9c2e2b8 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N2/content_digest @@ -7,15 +7,21 @@ "ref\01448987171.3041.2.camel@hasee\0" "ref\0998355860.30506151.1448989146641.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com\0" "ref\01449033191.3041.11.camel@hasee\0" - "From\0pbonzini@redhat.com (Paolo Bonzini)\0" - "Subject\0[RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0" + "From\0Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH 0/9] vhost-nvme: new qemu nvme backend using nvme target\0" "Date\0Wed, 2 Dec 2015 11:07:36 +0100\0" + "To\0Ming Lin <mlin@kernel.org>\0" + "Cc\0qemu-devel@nongnu.org" + Rob Nelson <rlnelson@google.com> + Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> + linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org + " virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "\n" "\n" "On 02/12/2015 06:13, Ming Lin wrote:\n" - "> On Tue, 2015-12-01@11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" + "> On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 11:59 -0500, Paolo Bonzini wrote:\n" ">>> What do you think about virtio-nvme+vhost-nvme?\n" ">>\n" ">> What would be the advantage over virtio-blk? Multiqueue is not supported\n" @@ -69,4 +75,4 @@ "\n" Paolo -7b2d971264b579bb3a9970290f13a6d6b2c0198255b934ce1a2374cc974ca526 +5fd223d50faacf3c0fd80cc6cafc1bdb8bd50a8f2ac9254bd8251f37ed5101c9
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.