From: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: generate libtermcap
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 11:39:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565ECA64.3070503@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151130233049.3ad42bd1@free-electrons.com>
On 11/30/2015 11:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Dear Pascal Mazon,
>
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 14:54:26 +0200, Pascal Mazon wrote:
>> There is no libtermcap package in buildroot, but ncurses implements
termcap
>> natively. Furthermore, ncurses already provides the termcap.h header
file.
>>
>> With this patch, we fix an issue encountered with some external
toolchains
>> that include a libtermcap.a (typically the GNU libtermcap version)
in their
>> sysroot folder.
>> Bash, for instance, would be linking with this libtermcap while using
>> headers from ncurses.
>>
>> In order to be consistent, let's make sure there is only the ncurses'
>> termcap library. To that effect, we:
>> - remove any libtermcap.* in the staging dir,
>> - install a link to libncurses static and/or shared in staging and
target
>> dirs.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pascal Mazon <pascal.mazon@6wind.com>
>
> We finally took a bit of time on IRC today to discuss your patch. From
> our point of view, the fact that your toolchain provides libtermcap.a
> is a bug of the toolchain. From Buildroot's point of view, a toolchain
> should not provide in its sysroot anything but the C library and its
> headers, and the kernel headers.
>
> If we start doing hacks in packages to cope with toolchain sysroot
> already shipped with some libraries, it's going to be an endless fight
> against those toolchains. You have the problem with libtermcap.a, but
> the next person will have it with libz.a, and then lib<something>, and
> again.
>
> Our suggestion is that you fix your toolchain either by asking your
> toolchain vendor, or by doing a quick hack to remove libtermcap.a
> before using the toolchain with Buildroot. If you add this toolchain as
> a known Buildroot profile, you can even automate this and make it part
> of the build process.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
>
I understand buildroot's point of view.
Indeed, it does not look like the best solution to hack in packages for
a problem from the toolchain.
I will try your suggestion.
Maybe we can modify copy_toolchain_sysroot in toolchain/helpers.mk to
add a custom "--exclude" when rsync-ing (with values taken from an newly
added option)?
Best regards,
--
Pascal Mazon
www.6wind.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-24 12:54 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] ncurses: generate libtermcap Pascal Mazon
2015-04-24 14:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-04-27 8:11 ` Pascal Mazon
2015-07-19 9:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-11-30 22:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2015-12-02 10:39 ` Pascal Mazon [this message]
2015-12-05 17:39 ` Yann E. MORIN
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-05-20 9:11 Pascal Mazon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565ECA64.3070503@6wind.com \
--to=pascal.mazon@6wind.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.