From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: George Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/3] mm: don't free pages until mm locks are released Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 16:30:41 +0000 Message-ID: <565F1CB1.7040909@citrix.com> References: <1447440595-1151-1-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <1447440595-1151-3-git-send-email-david.vrabel@citrix.com> <20151202162329.GA94392@deinos.phlegethon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a4AIp-0006Hr-Sv for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Wed, 02 Dec 2015 16:30:48 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20151202162329.GA94392@deinos.phlegethon.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Tim Deegan , "Tian, Kevin" Cc: "Nakajima, Jun" , George Dunlap , Andrew Cooper , David Vrabel , Jan Beulich , "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 02/12/15 16:23, Tim Deegan wrote: > At 07:25 +0000 on 02 Dec (1449041100), Tian, Kevin wrote: >>> From: David Vrabel [mailto:david.vrabel@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Saturday, November 14, 2015 2:50 AM >>> >>> If a page is freed without translations being invalidated, and the page is >>> subsequently allocated to another domain, a guest with a cached >>> translation will still be able to access the page. >>> >>> Currently translations are invalidated before releasing the page ref, but >>> while still holding the mm locks. To allow translations to be invalidated >>> without holding the mm locks, we need to keep a reference to the page >>> for a bit longer in some cases. >>> >>> [ This seems difficult to a) verify as correct; and b) difficult to get >>> correct in the future. A better suggestion would be useful. Perhaps >>> using something like pg->tlbflush_needed mechanism that already exists >>> for pages from PV guests? ] >> >> Per-page flag looks clean in general, but not an expert here. Tim might >> have a better idea. > > I think you can probably use the tlbflush_timestamp stuff as-is for > EPT flushes -- the existing TLB shootdowns already drop all EPT > translations. Are you saying that if you do a TLB shootdown you don't need to do an invept command? That doesn't sound right. -George