From: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
To: <openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 2/2] rpm: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 15:49:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <565F6770.7070401@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449091845-168695-3-git-send-email-mark.hatle@windriver.com>
On 12/2/15 3:30 PM, Mark Hatle wrote:
> From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
>
> The following error can occur:
> smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
> error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
>
> This was because:
> transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
> FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
> oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
>
> There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur. In both places
> the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
> This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" or
> "old preferred". It did not permissing "neither preferred". By removing the
Above should be written "It did not -permit- "neither preferred"."
Updated version available at:
git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky-contrib mgh/rpm-n32
> else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
> "neither is preferred".
>
> Note, if _transaction_color is 3, MIPS64 N32 will be skipped (pretend as
> installed).
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> ---
> ...ction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
>
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ed5d8a7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm/rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +From 67ec7531e6297200eaa97ef917d49b0a75876cb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> +From: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> +Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2015 00:56:07 -0800
> +Subject: [PATCH] lib/transaction.c: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32
> +
> +The following error can occur:
> + smart install libc6-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3 libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1@lib32_mips32r2octeon3
> +error: file /sbin/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> +error: file /sbin/.debug/ldconfig conflicts between attempted installs of libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.lib32_mips32r2octeon3 and libc6-dbg-2.22-r0.1.octeon3_n32
> +
> +This was because:
> +transactions_color = 001 (ELF32) & 010 (ELF64) & 100 (ELF32 N32 MIPS64)
> +FColor = Current file color (001) & transaction_color (111)
> +oFcolor = Previous file color (100) & transaction_color (111)
> +
> +There are two places where the conflict comparisons occur. In both places
> +the 'else' clause was too restrictive (opposite of the 'positive' clause).
> +This caused the system to only permit a binary comparison - "new preferred" or
> +"old preferred". It did not permissing "neither preferred". By removing the
> +else comparison the system will now perform a 'last-in-wins' resolution when
> +"neither is preferred".
> +
> +Upstream-Status: Pending
> +
> +Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
> +Signed-off-by: Mark Hatle <mark.hatle@windriver.com>
> +---
> + lib/transaction.c | 3 ++-
> + 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> +
> +Index: rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
> +===================================================================
> +--- rpm-5.4.14.orig/lib/transaction.c
> ++++ rpm-5.4.14/lib/transaction.c
> +@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int handleInstInstalledFile(const
> + fi->actions[fx] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
> + #endif
> + rConflicts = 0;
> +- } else if (FColor & prefcolor) {
> ++ } else {
> + #ifdef REFERENCE
> + rpmfsSetAction(fs, fx, FA_CREATE);
> + #else
> +@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ assert(otherFi != NULL);
> + fi->actions[i] = FA_SKIPCOLOR;
> + rConflicts = 0;
> + } else
> +- if (FColor == 0 && oFColor == 0) {
> ++ {
> + /* ... otherwise, do both, last in wins. */
> + otherFi->actions[otherFileNum] = FA_CREATE;
> + fi->actions[i] = FA_CREATE;
> diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> index e22d208..09baac0 100644
> --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/rpm/rpm_5.4.14.bb
> @@ -102,6 +102,7 @@ SRC_URI = "http://www.rpm5.org/files/rpm/rpm-5.4/rpm-5.4.14-0.20131024.src.rpm;e
> file://configure.ac-check-for-both-gpg2-and-gpg.patch \
> file://0001-define-EM_AARCH64.patch \
> file://rpm-rpmfc.c-fix-for-N32-MIPS64.patch \
> + file://rpm-lib-transaction.c-fix-file-conflicts-for-mips64-N32.patch \
> "
>
> # Uncomment the following line to enable platform score debugging
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-02 21:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-02 21:30 [v2 PATCH 0/2] rpm: Enable MIPS64 N32 transactions Mark Hatle
2015-12-02 21:30 ` [PATCH 1/2] rpm_5.4.14: " Mark Hatle
2015-12-02 21:30 ` [v2 PATCH 2/2] rpm: fix file conflicts for MIPS64 N32 Mark Hatle
2015-12-02 21:49 ` Mark Hatle [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=565F6770.7070401@windriver.com \
--to=mark.hatle@windriver.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.