From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Ostrovsky Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/VPMU: No need to check whether VPMU quirk is needed on Intel Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 10:46:37 -0500 Message-ID: <566063DD.1030905@oracle.com> References: <1448988612-1749-1-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> <1448988612-1749-3-git-send-email-boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: "Tian, Kevin" , "andrew.cooper3@citrix.com" , "jbeulich@suse.com" , "Nakajima, Jun" Cc: "dietmar.hahn@ts.fujitsu.com" , "xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/03/2015 01:18 AM, Tian, Kevin wrote: >> From: Boris Ostrovsky [mailto:boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2015 12:50 AM >> >> We only support family 6 so quirk handling is always needed. > what about you adding other family support in the future then you'll > add back below quirk check? Yes. -boris