From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [2.5 issue] virtio-1 in virtio-net and old vhost
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 10:06:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5660F542.8010309@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151202111128.03f4f46d.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
On 12/02/2015 06:11 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Dec 2015 13:54:09 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I wonder instead of rolling back in post_plugged(), maybe we could just
>> delay the region setups to post_plugged().
> If this is the saner thing to do for pci, sure.
>
>> Or just call transport
>> specific device_plugged() after get_features() call in
>> virtio_bus_device_plugged().
> The problem is that the VERSION_1 bit is only added in the
> ->device_plugged() callbacks by the transport, so ->get_features() can
> only be called after that. We have a dependency in both directions :(
Ok.
>
>> And I'm not sure we need to handle
>> migration compatibility in this case.
> The thing we would need to care about is basically the host kernel on
> the target supporting less than the host kernel on the source. Do we
> care about that in other contexts right now?
The problem is for pci: without this patch, guest may always see modern
bar is "disable-modern=false". But with this patch, on an old kernel
that does not support VERSION_1, even "disable-modern=false" were
specified, guest can not see modern bar anymore. Looks like a guest
visible change.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-04 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-01 10:11 [Qemu-devel] [2.5 issue] virtio-1 in virtio-net and old vhost Cornelia Huck
2015-12-01 12:10 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-01 14:21 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-02 5:54 ` Jason Wang
2015-12-02 10:11 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-02 12:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-12-04 2:06 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2015-12-04 10:15 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-12-04 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5660F542.8010309@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.