From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SRP initiator related bug fixes Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 16:07:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5665F502.5020305@redhat.com> References: <565DE3EC.2070002@sandisk.com> <5665DD50.5090906@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="t5AO8xWg1dFSr29O9dUC6PGsLOQKDE5ir" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5665DD50.5090906-XdAiOPVOjttBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Sagi Grimberg , Christoph Hellwig , Sebastian Parschauer , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --t5AO8xWg1dFSr29O9dUC6PGsLOQKDE5ir Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/07/2015 02:26 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 12/01/2015 10:16 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> This patch series contains six bug fixes either for the SRP initiator >> itself or for IB core functionality used by the SRP initiator. The ord= er >> of these patches matches the order in which the corresponding bugs hav= e >> been introduced. The patches in this series are: >> >> 0001-IB-srp-Fix-a-memory-leak.patch >> 0002-IB-srp-Fix-possible-send-queue-overflow.patch >> 0003-IB-srp-Initialize-dma_length-in-srp_map_idb.patch >> 0004-IB-srp-Fix-indirect-data-buffer-rkey-endianness.patch >> 0005-IB-core-Fix-ib_sg_to_pages.patch >> 0006-IB-srp-Fix-srp_map_sg_fr.patch >=20 > (replying to my own e-mail) >=20 > Hello Doug, >=20 > A consensus has been achieved about this patch series. Since one of the= > patches in this series fixes a data corruption bug that has been > introduced during the latest (v4.4) merge window I'd like to see these > patches upstream soon. Please recommend how I should proceed. When I > repost this patch series, should I send it to you, to Linus or perhaps > to someone else ? I was just getting ready to pull this set in. The only one you actually changed, and therefore needs either a resubmit or I have to be careful to get the follow-on version in Patchworks is 5/6, yes? --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --t5AO8xWg1dFSr29O9dUC6PGsLOQKDE5ir Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWZfUCAAoJELgmozMOVy/d8EgP/iENvLc46A56QHbhEbyUinm1 Wr3z/1zJQuCaqfpEdWfRvTi/ymEFRGXOxEPoSHNIxz7c22scHtoS3ezQMp46EyEc 0ArtAXYbReH3LRhfgNAfJtyO+K74QyKcz5gZaLRjveTny8thZwnDey7iUXVeMOXY YJrVWoo0PXP4i5h51N0LnOtJ4rzWq1HPi9HYENm975r4mUrOFlrly2ySGXS5INcJ YOq0xDtPD4zfxKjPpvYgpa1dcTknTPBDpYWqAKI8RvOUDCJuzZ6N0l0s4QyGqLSs DFHyp7i290Zijqnc1pYn2ZackhGihz97vp0liYRBjA9XSme5Rp5x0piN4H3t3FbS 7G3t0+7TLo5Zj49wcaAt8hasGO/aj5vq3zDTQaL30TZWAFT9MLOecguZnTCx4J0+ oJZjD39ZgNZDKbrZlO6nEIpDCVk9QLkaTF55p9PiHEjBM6e885JmlMTRuYjQg/42 SctD5Xt8av5Ahat4Wt4548x6koj3p5Y80cYWhHmt4bKS1W1iAemoDdZtIZiKfQw3 yXd8HhybZqB89Tbczn9re6p6oSfaVs7Mzp2Y0KklbJyPofSYDOJb2didIrT71/5c YKVEpbLUfommco++bPPfn8JwtKONq8qEPh+4LVkYj9WLH1bhcJqRqt03R9Jk1C6l jIDWVeH76AJ+6iDiUe3m =ZpM4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --t5AO8xWg1dFSr29O9dUC6PGsLOQKDE5ir-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html