From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bart Van Assche Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] SRP initiator related bug fixes Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2015 14:07:40 -0800 Message-ID: <5666032C.4090803@sandisk.com> References: <565DE3EC.2070002@sandisk.com> <5665DD50.5090906@sandisk.com> <5665F502.5020305@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5665F502.5020305-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Ledford Cc: Sagi Grimberg , Christoph Hellwig , Sebastian Parschauer , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 12/07/2015 01:07 PM, Doug Ledford wrote: > On 12/07/2015 02:26 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 12/01/2015 10:16 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: >>> This patch series contains six bug fixes either for the SRP initiator >>> itself or for IB core functionality used by the SRP initiator. The order >>> of these patches matches the order in which the corresponding bugs have >>> been introduced. The patches in this series are: >>> >>> 0001-IB-srp-Fix-a-memory-leak.patch >>> 0002-IB-srp-Fix-possible-send-queue-overflow.patch >>> 0003-IB-srp-Initialize-dma_length-in-srp_map_idb.patch >>> 0004-IB-srp-Fix-indirect-data-buffer-rkey-endianness.patch >>> 0005-IB-core-Fix-ib_sg_to_pages.patch >>> 0006-IB-srp-Fix-srp_map_sg_fr.patch >> >> (replying to my own e-mail) >> >> Hello Doug, >> >> A consensus has been achieved about this patch series. Since one of the >> patches in this series fixes a data corruption bug that has been >> introduced during the latest (v4.4) merge window I'd like to see these >> patches upstream soon. Please recommend how I should proceed. When I >> repost this patch series, should I send it to you, to Linus or perhaps >> to someone else ? > > I was just getting ready to pull this set in. The only one you actually > changed, and therefore needs either a resubmit or I have to be careful > to get the follow-on version in Patchworks is 5/6, yes? Hello Doug, You are correct, only for patch 5 the patch itself has been modified. The only change for the other patches is that Reviewed-by tags have been posted on the list. Thanks, Bart. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html