From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 10:28:17 +0800
Subject: [Ocfs2-devel] [PATCH] ocfs2: fix SGID not inherited issue
In-Reply-To: <20151208132215.6efe510a3868e57c9ca2f87a@linux-foundation.org>
References: <1449461346-21864-1-git-send-email-junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
	<20151208132215.6efe510a3868e57c9ca2f87a@linux-foundation.org>
Message-ID: <566791C1.6050407@oracle.com>
List-Id: <ocfs2-devel.oss.oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com

Hi Andrew,

On 12/09/2015 05:22 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon,  7 Dec 2015 12:09:06 +0800 Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> wrote:
> 
>> commit 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue") introduced an issue,
>> SGID of sub dir was not inherited from its parents dir. It is because SGID
>> is set into "inode->i_mode" in ocfs2_get_init_inode(), but is overwritten
>> by "mode" which don't have SGID set later.
>>
>> Fixes: 8f1eb48758aa ("ocfs2: fix umask ignored issue")
>> Signed-off-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> 
> 8f1eb48758aa is only in 4.4-rcX so I removed the cc:stable.
If 8f1eb48758aa is merged into stable, but this patch not, there will be
a regression issue in stable branch?

Thanks,
Junxiao.
>