[PATCH v8 3/4] arm64: Add do_softirq_own_stack() and enable irq_stacks

[james.morse@arm.com (James Morse)]

On 08/12/15 17:23, James Morse wrote:
> My only theory is that there is an off by one, and its reading what was
> x29 instead. This wouldn't show up in these tests, but might be a
> problem for aarch32 user-space, as presumably x29==0 when it switches to
> aarch64 mode for el0_irq(). I will try this tomorrow.

Yup, this is what is happening. Its an off-by-one due to broken thinking
about how the stack works. My broken thinking was:

>   top ------------
>       | dummy_lr | <- irq_stack_ptr
>       ------------
>       |   x29    |
>       ------------
>       |   x19    | <- irq_stack_ptr - 0x10
>       ------------
>       |   xzr    |
>       ------------

But the stack-pointer is decreased before use. So it actually looks like
this:

>       ------------
>       |          |  <- irq_stack_ptr
>   top ------------
>       | dummy_lr |
>       ------------
>       |   x29    | <- irq_stack_ptr - 0x10
>       ------------
>       |   x19    |
>       ------------
>       |   xzr    | <- irq_stack_ptr - 0x20
>       ------------

The value being used as the original stack is x29, which in all the
tests is sp but without the current frames data, hence there are no
missing frames in the output.

Jungseok Lee picked it up with a 32bit user space because aarch32 can't
use x29, so it remains 0 forever. The fix he posted is correct.

Will: do you want to take Jungseok Lee's patch as a 'Fixes:', or is it
easier if I repost the series?


Thanks,

James