From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Ledford Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Ibacm: default pkey for partitioned fabrics Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2015 16:35:02 -0500 Message-ID: <56689E86.9080807@redhat.com> References: <56683080.1090801@dev.mellanox.co.il> <3F128C9216C9B84BB6ED23EF16290AFB185810D9@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <5668354B.4090903@dev.mellanox.co.il> <3F128C9216C9B84BB6ED23EF16290AFB18581111@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <56683C6C.7070106@dev.mellanox.co.il> <3F128C9216C9B84BB6ED23EF16290AFB185811ED@CRSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com> <5668458A.7020809@dev.mellanox.co.il> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AAFE7F21@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <56685B98.5080803@dev.mellanox.co.il> <1828884A29C6694DAF28B7E6B8A82373AAFE7FB6@ORSMSX109.amr.corp.intel.com> <20151209182212.GF31636@obsidianresearch.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rIf7IaVi7o2xC1uWrnRpl4lApfkqFj8cn" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20151209182212.GF31636-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jason Gunthorpe , "Hefty, Sean" Cc: Hal Rosenstock , "Wan, Kaike" , "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --rIf7IaVi7o2xC1uWrnRpl4lApfkqFj8cn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 12/09/2015 01:22 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 05:13:49PM +0000, Hefty, Sean wrote: > =20 >> Example: Compute nodes are assigned pkeys 0x8000 and 0x7fff. A node >> running the job scheduler has pkeys 0xffff and 0x8000 (maybe it's >> also the backup SA). Ibacm would need to select pkey 0x8000 for >> communication. >=20 > I've also seen the reverse, eg 0xFFFF is used for default ipoib > communication and 0x8001 is assigned to only some nodes as a child > vlan. That's what I use internally in our test lab. > Choosing 0x8001 in that case won't work either. Nope. The suggestion here would break our setup. Well, *would* being the operative word where what I mean is would if we used ibacm. But that's a story for another email... --=20 Doug Ledford GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD --rIf7IaVi7o2xC1uWrnRpl4lApfkqFj8cn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWaJ6GAAoJELgmozMOVy/d/NUP+wXktwDOQua72f1/SJcZWCT0 8VW4xk+mlIqiZzOd2r0iJ3JuzFj/LGC7XL2RIoa6wVOrmRM/MW8dHQL8KKFxBqWr Mi6Cio2sheUUJDp3QKb7VY3k0IyMP0TvrAL4rlFh8K1Ow6UHtx7CTVWwluq2kUBU NBCFGutF9vq1iR7DIcyiu10LCwE+fv+LyxW4hNXcc0CsjxVuT2iLT6n++cwo5KGc Dlb90/YakC/5lvgD0QMNZnrGIlpP/fBfGyLNVaSBjpigXMumaPUJj4YMi41vM0mn HEEFUhpmCmMy6LE+VT+vtfVO1duuGfbvolb0nhM0Mqz4dh4EnXxgEyD35N1yKQ5K JHSNTlE1/WfV4nIEGdtjPtupZ+J2/u09Z1UuN0KHcQ/b9ie5cCPZ7dRsig2KAYom YFo0kRlHkcwW5iThDlLr8zc/9bqRjfZC3qWcUcvYrW3Ce6s0BkJnw1SBzOlnfQEn z7uJTHSRVzzAvYcFjDGhKaiQr/ABxYAmImpbUufff2rO5Qc+QgNiH4q5u2bPLaW5 HjT7jmpp2mTABjluhItX7kqt0pod/fNXwmDheSF2cdDSkOf8tY/nR3TAAi2eENq5 wwn+ZH31XZpHs+6xv5ft40Y2hWX+mpwXYtg/J6CT3hOiqnHMEHsdHAlV0Nc1D84y 6qkmJxHGImKdtJKDJO3q =m5rH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rIf7IaVi7o2xC1uWrnRpl4lApfkqFj8cn-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html