From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 89641E00AA8; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:41:59 -0800 (PST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dev.rtsoft.ru (mail.dev.rtsoft.ru [213.79.90.226]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B58E002F9 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2015 22:41:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.112.12] (fw-int.dev.rtsoft.ru [192.168.1.70]) by dev.rtsoft.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 264AC438C8; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:41:55 +0300 (MSK) To: Fabio Estevam References: <006a01d131c3$31bd7a60$95386f20$@gasera.fi> <5667D66B.30004@dev.rtsoft.ru> From: Nikita Yushchenko X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Organization: RTSoft Software Development Center Message-ID: <56691EB2.9000403@dev.rtsoft.ru> Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 09:41:54 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: Qt 5.4 on Kontron SMARC sAMX6i X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 06:41:59 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >> Upstreaming smx6 support was blocked about a year ago by u-boot >> question. Smx6 u-boot is separate project inside Kontron, with unclear >> status, probably with non-public code inside. It is not part of linux >> BSP; I actually had only binary while working on BSP. > > Have you asked them for the source code? They should be able to > provide their U-boot source code. They actually did, however providing it to sub-contractor and publishing it into public is far not the same. We've discussed upstreraming with them a couple of times. They are not against in principle, but it requires far non-zero effort for which nor they not we have spare resources. Maybe, some day...