From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] VT-d: Reduce spin timeout to 1ms, which can be boot-time changed. Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 19:03:00 +0000 Message-ID: <5669CC64.7050407@citrix.com> References: <1449739990-66155-1-git-send-email-quan.xu@intel.com> <1449739990-66155-2-git-send-email-quan.xu@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1449739990-66155-2-git-send-email-quan.xu@intel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Quan Xu , jbeulich@suse.com, kevin.tian@intel.com Cc: feng.wu@intel.com, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, eddie.dong@intel.com, tim@xen.org, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, jun.nakajima@intel.com, keir@xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 10/12/15 09:33, Quan Xu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Quan Xu > --- > xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c > index b81b0bd..990baf2 100644 > --- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c > +++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/qinval.c > @@ -28,6 +28,11 @@ > #include "vtd.h" > #include "extern.h" > > +static int __read_mostly iommu_qi_timeout_ms = 1; > +integer_param("iommu_qi_timeout_ms", iommu_qi_timeout_ms); > + > +#define IOMMU_QI_TIMEOUT (iommu_qi_timeout_ms * MILLISECS(1)) > + > static void print_qi_regs(struct iommu *iommu) > { > u64 val; > @@ -167,10 +172,12 @@ static int queue_invalidate_wait(struct iommu *iommu, > start_time = NOW(); > while ( poll_slot != QINVAL_STAT_DONE ) > { > - if ( NOW() > (start_time + DMAR_OPERATION_TIMEOUT) ) > + if ( NOW() > (start_time + IOMMU_QI_TIMEOUT) ) > { > print_qi_regs(iommu); > - panic("queue invalidate wait descriptor was not executed"); > + dprintk(XENLOG_WARNING VTDPREFIX, > + "Queue invalidate wait descriptor was timeout.\n"); > + return -ETIMEDOUT; > } > cpu_relax(); > } This patch misses a second use of DMAR_OPERATION_TIMEOUT, in IOMMU_WAIT_OP() which in turn is used in a large number of locations. All of these locations equally need to be chopped down to a low number of milliseconds. ~Andrew