On 12/12/2015 10:02 PM, Filipe Manana wrote: > > > On 12/12/2015 09:43 PM, Greg KH wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 09:35:45PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 12/12/2015 08:03 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 11:57:49AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Sat, Dec 12, 2015 at 02:32:10PM +0000, Filipe Manana wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/11/2015 04:54 PM, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The patch below does not apply to the 4.2-stable tree. >>>>>>> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm >>>>>>> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit >>>>>>> id to . >>>>>> >>>>>> Greg, please find attached a version of the patch that applies against >>>>>> 4.2.7. >>>>> >>>>> This patch breaks the build: >>> >>> I did build and tested it (in reply to your next comment about sending >>> untested stuff). >>> See comment inlined below. >>> >>>>> >>>>> fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c: In function ‘merge_ref’: >>>>> fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.c:223:38: error: ‘struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node’ has no mem >>>>> ber named ‘no_quota’ >>>>> if (next->type != ref->type || next->no_quota != ref->no_quota) >>> >>> I don't get why you're getting that error. >>> struct btrfs_delayed_ref_node has a member named 'no_quota': >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h?id=refs/tags/v4.2.7#n36 >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/fs/btrfs/delayed-ref.h?id=refs/tags/v4.2.7#n71 >>> >>> Am I missing something? >>> >>> I think you applied 2 patches in the wrong order. You should apply the >>> following two in this order: >>> >>> 1) "Btrfs: fix regression when running delayed references" - >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=2c3cf7d5f6105bb957df125dfce61d4483b8742d >>> >>> 2) "Btrfs: fix regression running delayed references when using qgroups" >>> - >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b06c4bf5c874a57254b197f53ddf588e7a24a2bf >>> >>> Please confirm if you applied those 2 in that specific order, because it >>> doesn't seem so. The first one adds code that still uses member >>> "no_quota" while the second one removes the "no_quota" member from that >>> struct. >> >> You only sent me one patch, one for both trees. I built the tree after >> applying what I had from you. >> >> If you need/want me to apply 2 patches, please send both of them, can >> you do so for the -rc kernels I just released? > > I didn't send both patches because for the first one there wasn't any > complain about it not applying cleanly to the 4.2 and 4.3 trees. So I > only sent the second one, since that was the only one that didn't apply > cleanly. > > Ok, I'll do it again, based on those rcs, and send you both patches for > both stable releases. Where are those rc branches? > > thanks Ok, here are (as attachments) the 2 patches for 4.2 and 4.3 that should apply cleanly against what's in your queues. The file names reflect the release and order: 0001-4.2.7-Btrfs-fix-regression-when-running-delayed-references.patch 0001-4.3.2-Btrfs-fix-regression-when-running-delayed-references.patch 0002-4.2.7-Btrfs-fix-regression-running-delayed-references-when.patch 0002-4.3.2-Btrfs-fix-regression-running-delayed-references-when.patch Thanks > >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h >>