All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: He YunLei <heyunlei@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: hebiao6@huawei.com, stuart.li@huawei.com,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] back-up raw_super in sbi
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 17:56:49 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <566E9261.8040702@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151208181902.GA10025@jaegeuk.local>

On 2015/12/9 2:19, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Hi Yunlei,
>
> On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 09:17:13PM +0800, Yunlei He wrote:
>> write_checkpoint() tries to get cp_blkaddr from superblock buffer,
>> if the buffer happen to be destroied by something else, it may
>> bring in unpredictable effect on f2fs.
>>
>> this patch fix it by back-up a raw_super copy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>   fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c |  3 ++-
>>   fs/f2fs/f2fs.h       | 10 ++++++++++
>>   fs/f2fs/node.c       |  2 +-
>>   fs/f2fs/super.c      | 12 ++++++++----
>>   4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> index f661d80..1e342fd 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>> @@ -276,13 +276,14 @@ long sync_meta_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, enum page_type type,
>>   						long nr_to_write)
>>   {
>>   	struct address_space *mapping = META_MAPPING(sbi);
>> -	pgoff_t index = 0, end = LONG_MAX, prev = LONG_MAX;
>> +	pgoff_t index, end = LONG_MAX, prev = LONG_MAX;
>>   	struct pagevec pvec;
>>   	long nwritten = 0;
>>   	struct writeback_control wbc = {
>>   		.for_reclaim = 0,
>>   	};
>>
>> +	index = __start_cp_addr(sbi);
>
> No need to do this.
>
>>   	pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
>>
>>   	while (index <= end) {
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> index 0052ae8..6afb56c 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
>> @@ -1167,6 +1167,16 @@ static inline block_t __start_sum_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>>   	return le32_to_cpu(F2FS_CKPT(sbi)->cp_pack_start_sum);
>>   }
>>
>> +static inline block_t __start_main_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> +{
>> +	return le32_to_cpu(F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi)->main_blkaddr);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline block_t __start_sum_addr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi)
>> +{
>> +	return le32_to_cpu(F2FS_CKPT(sbi)->cp_pack_start_sum);
>> +}
>> +
>
> Ditto.
>
>>   static inline bool inc_valid_node_count(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>>   						struct inode *inode)
>>   {
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> index 7bcbc6e..7d2b0bb 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>> @@ -1161,7 +1161,7 @@ int sync_node_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, nid_t ino,
>>   	pagevec_init(&pvec, 0);
>>
>>   next_step:
>> -	index = 0;
>> +	index = __start_main_addr(sbi);
>
> No, its index is for nid.
>
>>   	end = LONG_MAX;
>>
>>   	while (index <= end) {
>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> index bd7e9c6..d394711 100644
>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>> @@ -1040,6 +1040,9 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct super_block *sb,
>>   	struct f2fs_super_block *super;
>>   	int err = 0;
>>
>> +	super = kzalloc(sizeof(struct f2fs_super_block), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +	if (!super)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>>   retry:
>>   	buffer = sb_bread(sb, block);
>>   	if (!buffer) {
>> @@ -1055,9 +1058,8 @@ retry:
>>   		}
>>   	}
>>
>> -	super = (struct f2fs_super_block *)
>> -		((char *)(buffer)->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET);
>> -
>> +	memcpy(super, buffer->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET,
>> +					sizeof(struct f2fs_super_block));
>>   	/* sanity checking of raw super */
>>   	if (sanity_check_raw_super(sb, super)) {
>>   		brelse(buffer);
>> @@ -1090,8 +1092,10 @@ retry:
>>
>>   out:
>>   	/* No valid superblock */
>> -	if (!*raw_super)
>> +	if (!*raw_super) {
>> +		kfree(super);
>>   		return err;
>> +	}
>
> Need to consider f2fs_commit_super and kfree() in put_super.

We also need to consider f2fs_fill_super error processing procedure:

@@ -1388,6 +1388,7 @@ free_options:
         kfree(options);
  free_sb_buf:
         brelse(raw_super_buf);
+       kfree(raw_super);
	
>
> Could you check out this patch?
>
> ---
>   fs/f2fs/super.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> index dbf16ad..8541c93 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
> @@ -567,6 +567,7 @@ static void f2fs_put_super(struct super_block *sb)
>
>   	sb->s_fs_info = NULL;
>   	brelse(sbi->raw_super_buf);
> +	kfree(sbi->raw_super);
>   	kfree(sbi);
>   }
>
> @@ -1040,6 +1041,9 @@ static int read_raw_super_block(struct super_block *sb,
>   	struct f2fs_super_block *super;
>   	int err = 0;
>
> +	super = kzalloc(sizeof(struct f2fs_super_block), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!super)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
>   retry:
>   	buffer = sb_bread(sb, block);
>   	if (!buffer) {
> @@ -1055,8 +1059,7 @@ retry:
>   		}
>   	}
>
> -	super = (struct f2fs_super_block *)
> -		((char *)(buffer)->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET);
> +	memcpy(super, buffer->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, sizeof(*super));
>
>   	/* sanity checking of raw super */
>   	if (sanity_check_raw_super(sb, super)) {
> @@ -1090,14 +1093,17 @@ retry:
>
>   out:
>   	/* No valid superblock */
> -	if (!*raw_super)
> +	if (!*raw_super) {
> +		kfree(super);
>   		return err;
> +	}
>
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
>   int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
>   {
> +	struct f2fs_super_block *super = F2FS_RAW_SUPER(sbi);
>   	struct buffer_head *sbh = sbi->raw_super_buf;
>   	struct buffer_head *bh;
>   	int err;
> @@ -1108,7 +1114,7 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
>   		return -EIO;
>
>   	lock_buffer(bh);
> -	memcpy(bh->b_data, sbh->b_data, sbh->b_size);
> +	memcpy(bh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super));
>   	WARN_ON(sbh->b_size != F2FS_BLKSIZE);
>   	set_buffer_uptodate(bh);
>   	set_buffer_dirty(bh);
> @@ -1124,6 +1130,10 @@ int f2fs_commit_super(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, bool recover)
>
>   	/* write current valid superblock */
>   	lock_buffer(sbh);
> +	if (memcmp(sbh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super))) {
> +		f2fs_msg(sbi->sb, KERN_INFO, "Write modified valid superblock");
> +		memcpy(sbh->b_data + F2FS_SUPER_OFFSET, super, sizeof(*super));
> +	}
>   	set_buffer_dirty(sbh);
>   	unlock_buffer(sbh);
>
>
It looks good to me, but can we releasing grabbed block buffer 'sbi->raw_super_buf'
as Chao Yu said.

Thanks.
Yunlei


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-14  9:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-08 13:17 [PATCH] back-up raw_super in sbi Yunlei He
2015-12-08 18:19 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-14  9:56   ` He YunLei [this message]
2015-12-14 17:28     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2015-12-15  9:04       ` Chao Yu
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-09  6:11 Chao Yu
2015-12-09  7:15 ` He YunLei
2015-12-11  7:02   ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=566E9261.8040702@huawei.com \
    --to=heyunlei@huawei.com \
    --cc=hebiao6@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=stuart.li@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.