From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jim Fehlig Subject: Re: [libvirt test] 65654: regressions - FAIL Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 23:39:37 -0700 Message-ID: <566FB5A9.30205@suse.com> References: <1449853570.30975.74.camel@citrix.com> <22123.1253.99185.935286@mariner.uk.xensource.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, Ian Campbell , osstest service owner List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/14/2015 03:41 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Fri, 11 Dec 2015, Ian Jackson wrote: >> Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [libvirt test] 65654: regressions - FAIL"): >>> On Fri, 2015-12-11 at 15:18 +0000, osstest service owner wrote: >>>> flight 65654 libvirt real [real] >>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/65654/ >>>> >>>> Regressions :-( >>>> >>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >>>> including tests which could not be run: >>>> test-amd64-amd64-libvirt-vhd 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 63340 >>> Stefano has posted a fix for this to qemu-upstream but it isn't going to >>> make the QEMU 2.5.0 release: >>> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-12/msg01435.html >>> and given the freeze for that it is going to be a while before it is >>> accepted. >>> >>> I don't really see that point in blocking the libvirt push gate over this >>> issue, so I would suggest a force push. >> I have no objection, if Jim and Stefano are happy with that. > That's OK for me No objections from me either. Regards, Jim