From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=c3=a9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/9] Introduce HVM without dm and new
 boot ABI
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 16:52:38 +0100
Message-ID: <56703746.1040703@citrix.com>
References: <1449506917-26426-1-git-send-email-roger.pau@citrix.com>
	<567021D302000078000BF9E6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com>
	<1450192097.16856.182.camel@citrix.com>
	<1450192310.16856.184.camel@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Received: from mail6.bemta3.messagelabs.com ([195.245.230.39])
	by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <prvs=7848c8341=roger.pau@citrix.com>)
	id 1a8t7X-0007UF-Al
	for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2015 17:10:39 +0000
In-Reply-To: <1450192310.16856.184.camel@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@suse.com>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>
Cc: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

El 15/12/15 a les 16.11, Ian Campbell ha escrit:
> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 15:08 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2015-12-15 at 06:21 -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>
>>> I've just applied 1-3, 5, and 6. 4 has been applied earlier. I'd
>>> appreciate if the last three (tools only) patches could be taken
>>> care of by a tools committer.
>>
>> All done, thanks all.

Thanks :).

> Roger,
> 
> While cleaning out my queue folder of related things I came across various
> versions of "Boot ABI for HVM guests without a device-model". Did all of
> that end up in some form in this series? I don't see anything under docs/*
> is all, but maybe it all ended up in xen/include/public/*.h?

No, it didn't end up anywhere. TBH I'm not sure whether I should commit
it as a separate file or as an update to pvh.markdown, but then I should
probably do it when the original PVH implementation is gone. Any opinions?

Roger.