All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Erez Shitrit
	<erezsh-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org>,
	Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org"
	<linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Change sendq threshold size
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 12:36:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56704F82.6060405@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAk-MO_AjkaktRRXEPWSGTqf6t2F_0xS8OFVh_8PN4tyYRMZSQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 640 bytes --]

On 11/17/2015 01:45 AM, Erez Shitrit wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 8:54 PM, Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>> Expecting half of the queue to be empty before reopening netif_queue seems
>> too high.
>> With this fix threshold will be 90%.
> 
> Is this backed by tests? why not 75% or 25%?

Much like Erez, I suspect this is a bad change.  Unless there are
performance numbers to show that under heavy usage this is actually a
positive change, I'm not inclined to take it.


-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 884 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 17:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-16 18:54 [PATCH] IB/ipoib: Change sendq threshold size Yuval Shaia
     [not found] ` <1447700076-795-1-git-send-email-yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-17  6:45   ` Erez Shitrit
     [not found]     ` <CAAk-MO_AjkaktRRXEPWSGTqf6t2F_0xS8OFVh_8PN4tyYRMZSQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-12-15 17:36       ` Doug Ledford [this message]
2015-11-17  8:11   ` Or Gerlitz
     [not found]     ` <564AE125.4030700-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org>
2015-11-17 15:02       ` Yuval Shaia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56704F82.6060405@redhat.com \
    --to=dledford-h+wxahxf7alqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=erezsh-LDSdmyG8hGV8YrgS2mwiifqBs+8SCbDb@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=yuval.shaia-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.