All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 00:21:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5670A068.3040602@iogearbox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450178464-27721-6-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com>

On 12/15/2015 12:21 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
...
> +/* Called from syscall, and the code is borrowed from blk_mq */
> +static int htab_pre_alloc_elems(struct bpf_htab *htab)
> +{
> +	const unsigned max_order = 4;
> +	unsigned elem_size = htab->elem_size, i;
> +	unsigned nr_entries = htab->map.max_entries;
> +	size_t left = nr_entries * elem_size;
> +
> +	htab->elems = kzalloc(nr_entries * sizeof(struct htab_elem *),
> +			      GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY);

Should this use GFP_USER (same below)?

Also, when having a large number of elements e.g. > 1Mio, should we fall
back to vzalloc()?

> +	if (!htab->elems)
> +		goto fail;
> +
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&htab->page_list);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < nr_entries; ) {
> +		int this_order = max_order;
> +		struct page *page;
> +		int j, to_do;
> +		void *p;
> +
> +		while (left < order_to_size(this_order - 1) && this_order)
> +			this_order--;
> +
> +		do {
> +			page = alloc_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN |
> +					   __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_ZERO,
> +					   this_order);
> +			if (page)
> +				break;
...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-12-15 23:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-15 11:20 [PATCH 0/6] bpf: hash: optimization Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:20 ` [PATCH 1/6] bpf: hash: use atomic count Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] hlist: prepare for supporting bit spinlock Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] bpf: hash: move select_bucket() out of htab's spinlock Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] bpf: hash: convert per-hashtable lock into per-bucket bit spinlock Ming Lei
2015-12-15 22:51   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-12-16  2:57     ` Ming Lei
     [not found]       ` <CAHbLzkpW_seTrs+WgFqsriH5uhG4LMY_jiYC0iRQ-LAdJFiUjw@mail.gmail.com>
2015-12-16  6:58         ` Ming Lei
2015-12-18  6:20           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-12-26  8:58             ` Ming Lei
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] bpf: hash: avoid to call kmalloc() in eBPF prog Ming Lei
2015-12-15 23:10   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2015-12-15 23:42     ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-12-16  7:13     ` Ming Lei
2015-12-15 23:21   ` Daniel Borkmann [this message]
2015-12-15 23:35   ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-12-16  0:12     ` Daniel Borkmann
2015-12-15 11:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] bpf: hash: reorganize 'struct htab_elem' Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5670A068.3040602@iogearbox.net \
    --to=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom.leiming@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.