Re: [PATCH 0/2] Debian multilib packaging fixes

["Aníbal Limón" <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com>]

Hi Matt,

I tried to do again without your patches and the problem appears, seems
to be an older problem.

Regards,
	alimon

On 12/16/2015 07:31 AM, Matt Madison wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Aníbal Limón
> <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> Hi Matt,
>>
>> Trying to build core-image-sato with qemux86-64 and multilib enabled an
>> errors appear (see attached log), next the config.
> 
> OK, yep, I can reproduce this.  I'll investigate further.
> 
> Thanks,
> -Matt
> 
> 
>>
>> MACHINE ??= "qemux86-64"
>>
>> IMAGE_INSTALL_append = " lib32-connman"
>> require conf/multilib.conf
>> MULTILIBS = "multilib:lib32"
>> DEFAULTTUNE_virtclass-multilib-lib32 = "x86"
>> PACKAGE_CLASSES ?= "package_deb"
>> EXTRA_IMAGE_FEATURES = "debug-tweaks package-management"
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>         alimon
>>
>>
>> On 12/15/2015 01:28 PM, Matt Madison wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Aníbal Limón
>>> <anibal.limon@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Matt,
>>>>
>>>> I'm starting to look at your patches, in what arches/combinations you
>>>> test the patches?
>>>
>>> I've been working on a BSP layer for the jetson-tx1, which is
>>> aarch64/armv7a-hf, so that's what I've been testing with.  The BSP
>>> defs are in https://github.com/madisongh/meta-tegra.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> -Matt
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>         alimon
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/06/2015 11:25 AM, Matt Madison wrote:
>>>>> I ran into sevearl issues while trying to build an ARM multilib rootfs
>>>>> using Debian packaging.  After several go-rounds, it looked like the
>>>>> cleanest solution was to tweak how DPKG_ARCH gets constructed and
>>>>> to have the DpkgPM class in oe/package_manager.py use that variable
>>>>> to locate multilib variants (similar to RpmPM).  I also took the
>>>>> liberty of expanding the Debian architecture mappings so the names
>>>>> align better with what's documented on the Debian wiki, for those
>>>>> cases where a direct mapping is possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> Matt Madison (2):
>>>>>   package_deb.bbclass, cross-canadian.bbclass: DPKG_ARCH mapping
>>>>>     function
>>>>>   package_manager.py: fixes for multilib deb packaging builds
>>>>>
>>>>>  meta/classes/cross-canadian.bbclass |  2 +-
>>>>>  meta/classes/package_deb.bbclass    | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>>>>>  meta/lib/oe/package_manager.py      | 17 +++++++++++------
>>>>>  3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>>