From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "pankaj.dubey" Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:09:35 +0530 Message-ID: <56737FF7.6060907@samsung.com> References: <1449906242-20843-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <567244C4.8080708@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:48938 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S965128AbbLRDjP (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Dec 2015 22:39:15 -0500 In-reply-to: <567244C4.8080708@samsung.com> Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com, p.fedin@samsung.com, andi.shyti@samsung.com Hi Krzysztof, On Thursday 17 December 2015 10:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12.12.2015 16:43, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> THIS IS A RESEND OF ONCE MERGED INTO kgene/for-next AND LOST PATCHES >> >> Series v5 got merged in kgene/for-next but due to last moment change before pull >> these patches were not accepted during 4.3 merge window.After that kgene/for-next >> got rebased over 4.4-rc1 these patches got dropped into another branch and till >> date not included to for-next. >> >> Since then due to minor change in "drivers/soc/", patches are not getting applied >> cleanly so rebasing on current for-next and resending all these with fix in memory >> mapping included. >> >> >> This patch set adds support for Exynos SROM controller DT based driver. >> Currently SROM register sets are used only during S2R, so driver >> basically added for taking care of S2R. It will help us in removing >> static mapping from exynos.c and other extra code handline during S2R. >> >> This patch set also updated exynos4 and exynos5 dtsi files for with device >> node for srom, and added binding documentation for the same. >> >> First two patches are some minor cleanup in mach-exynos. >> >> Patchset v1 was posted here[1] >> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/29/98 >> Patchset v2 was posted here[2] >> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/24/125 >> Patchset v3 was posted here[3] >> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/392 >> Patchset v3 was posted here[4] >> [4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/19/278 >> >> This patchset, I have tested on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for boot >> and S2R functionality. > > Let me share the plan/status: Thanks for sharing status on this. > 1. Currently Kukjin Kim is on out of office (he told me he will be back > on Christmas). > 2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my requests. > > 3. I applied this patchset to my branch: > next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch > > 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my > previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so > depending on the timing of arm-soc/Christmas/Kukjin this may or may not > go into v4.5 (yay...). > I am fine in either way. But prefer if it goes in v4.5, just to save time in rebasing. > 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further > for v4.6. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > Thanks, Pankaj Dubey From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (pankaj.dubey) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:09:35 +0530 Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver In-Reply-To: <567244C4.8080708@samsung.com> References: <1449906242-20843-1-git-send-email-pankaj.dubey@samsung.com> <567244C4.8080708@samsung.com> Message-ID: <56737FF7.6060907@samsung.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Krzysztof, On Thursday 17 December 2015 10:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 12.12.2015 16:43, Pankaj Dubey wrote: >> THIS IS A RESEND OF ONCE MERGED INTO kgene/for-next AND LOST PATCHES >> >> Series v5 got merged in kgene/for-next but due to last moment change before pull >> these patches were not accepted during 4.3 merge window.After that kgene/for-next >> got rebased over 4.4-rc1 these patches got dropped into another branch and till >> date not included to for-next. >> >> Since then due to minor change in "drivers/soc/", patches are not getting applied >> cleanly so rebasing on current for-next and resending all these with fix in memory >> mapping included. >> >> >> This patch set adds support for Exynos SROM controller DT based driver. >> Currently SROM register sets are used only during S2R, so driver >> basically added for taking care of S2R. It will help us in removing >> static mapping from exynos.c and other extra code handline during S2R. >> >> This patch set also updated exynos4 and exynos5 dtsi files for with device >> node for srom, and added binding documentation for the same. >> >> First two patches are some minor cleanup in mach-exynos. >> >> Patchset v1 was posted here[1] >> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/29/98 >> Patchset v2 was posted here[2] >> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/24/125 >> Patchset v3 was posted here[3] >> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/392 >> Patchset v3 was posted here[4] >> [4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/19/278 >> >> This patchset, I have tested on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for boot >> and S2R functionality. > > Let me share the plan/status: Thanks for sharing status on this. > 1. Currently Kukjin Kim is on out of office (he told me he will be back > on Christmas). > 2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my requests. > > 3. I applied this patchset to my branch: > next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch > > 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my > previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so > depending on the timing of arm-soc/Christmas/Kukjin this may or may not > go into v4.5 (yay...). > I am fine in either way. But prefer if it goes in v4.5, just to save time in rebasing. > 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further > for v4.6. > > If you have any questions, please let me know. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > > Thanks, Pankaj Dubey