From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [xen-unstable test] 66454: regressions - FAIL Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:15:38 +0000 Message-ID: <5674150A.2040904@citrix.com> References: <5673F5EF02000078000C11C9@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <567407EC.3040303@citrix.com> <1450445590.4053.226.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta14.messagelabs.com ([193.109.254.103]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1a9vqd-00088j-2J for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 14:17:31 +0000 In-Reply-To: <1450445590.4053.226.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , Jan Beulich , Doug Goldstein Cc: xen-devel , osstest-admin@xenproject.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 18/12/15 13:33, Ian Campbell wrote: >> However, it is also wrong for OSSTest to be attempting to build a 32bit >> > hypervisor on any branch since 4.3. It seems to me that there is a bug >> > there as well. > It is doing a build because it wants the 32 bit tools and it just does a > make dist. This is perfectly fine behaviour IMHO. > Then "make dist" needs fixing. It is not fine to have the Xen component silently succeed and do nothing when asked to compile an invalid combination. ~Andrew