From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: elfring@users.sourceforge.net (SF Markus Elfring)
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2015 09:12:26 +0100
Subject: [Cocci] Coccinelle for other programming languages
In-Reply-To: <B517F47C2F6D914AA8121201F9EBEE6701C7CF57C282@Mail1.FCMD.local>
References: <B517F47C2F6D914AA8121201F9EBEE6701C7CF57C22C@Mail1.FCMD.local>
 <alpine.DEB.2.10.1512171825240.10291@hadrien>
 <20151217221143.GV20409@wotan.suse.de>
 <5673BF55.4010902@users.sourceforge.net>
 <B517F47C2F6D914AA8121201F9EBEE6701C7CF57C282@Mail1.FCMD.local>
Message-ID: <5675116A.2040000@users.sourceforge.net>
To: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
List-Id: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr

> What is the effort it will take to come up with a Coccinelle for dynamic languages
> such as Python, JavaScript, etc.

Would you like to improve any software design elements from compiler technology
like the following?

1. Token stream
2. Abstract syntax tree
3. Control flow graph


> Which parts of Coccinelle would require customization, rework, etc.

Which impression do you get from corresponding open issues?

How do you think about to bring software developments forward around
computation tree logic?

Regards,
Markus