From: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
To: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>,
intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/2] gpu/tests/gpu_buddy: Add KUnit test for gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2026 10:00:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5675a0ee-a5ee-480e-9a02-b71225c1d86d@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260806053624.3215216-6-tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
On 06/08/2026 06:36, Tejas Upadhyay wrote:
> Add a new KUnit test gpu_test_buddy_addr_to_block() that validates the
> gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block() helper which traces a address back
> to its allocated buddy block.
>
> The test covers:
> - Exact address matching returns the correct allocated block
> - An unallocated address inside the manager should return NULL
> - An address outside the manager should return -ENXIO
>
> v4(MattA):
> - Add test for unaligned address
> v3(Sashiko):
> - remove unused target_addr variable
> v2(Sashiko):
> - Drop the mutex and lockdep annotation; standalone KUnit tests do
> not register a driver lock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay <tejas.upadhyay@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
> index 7df5c2ae83bb..04e425eb8bdd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/tests/gpu_buddy_test.c
> @@ -1381,6 +1381,50 @@ static void gpu_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order(struct kunit *test)
> gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
> }
>
> +static void gpu_test_buddy_addr_to_block(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct gpu_buddy_block *allocated_block, *found_block;
> + LIST_HEAD(allocated_list);
> + const u64 test_size = SZ_4M + SZ_2M;
> + const u64 alloc_start = SZ_4M;
> + const u64 alloc_size = SZ_4K;
> + const u64 chunk_size = SZ_4K;
> + struct gpu_buddy mm;
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_init(&mm, test_size, chunk_size),
> + "buddy_init failed\n");
> +
> + KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE_MSG(test, gpu_buddy_alloc_blocks(&mm, alloc_start,
> + alloc_start + alloc_size,
> + alloc_size, chunk_size,
> + &allocated_list, 0),
> + "buddy_alloc failed\n");
> +
> + allocated_block = list_first_entry(&allocated_list, struct gpu_buddy_block, link);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gpu_buddy_block_offset(allocated_block), alloc_start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, gpu_buddy_block_size(&mm, allocated_block), alloc_size);
> +
> + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, alloc_start);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, found_block, allocated_block);
> +
> + /* Unaligned address inside the allocated block (should resolve to the same block) */
> + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, alloc_start + 16);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, found_block, allocated_block);
> +
> + /* An unallocated address inside the manager should return NULL. */
> + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm,
> + alloc_start - chunk_size);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_NULL(test, found_block);
> +
> + /* An address outside the manager should return -ENXIO. */
> + found_block = gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block(&mm, test_size);
> + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, PTR_ERR(found_block), -ENXIO);
> +
> + /* 3. Standard inline cleanup flow */
> + gpu_buddy_free_list(&mm, &allocated_list, 0);
> + gpu_buddy_fini(&mm);
> +}
> +
> static int gpu_buddy_suite_init(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> {
> while (!random_seed)
> @@ -1405,6 +1449,7 @@ static struct kunit_case gpu_buddy_tests[] = {
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_alloc_exceeds_max_order),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_offset_aligned_allocation),
> KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_subtree_offset_alignment_stress),
> + KUNIT_CASE(gpu_test_buddy_addr_to_block),
> {}
> };
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-06 5:36 [PATCH V4 0/2] Add gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block helper and its Kunit tests Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-06 5:36 ` [PATCH V4 1/2] drm/gpu: Add gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block helper Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-06 5:36 ` [PATCH V4 2/2] gpu/tests/gpu_buddy: Add KUnit test for gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block Tejas Upadhyay
2026-08-06 5:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-06 9:00 ` Matthew Auld [this message]
2026-08-06 9:46 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-06 10:19 ` Matthew Auld
2026-08-06 11:12 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-08-06 11:18 ` Upadhyay, Tejas
2026-08-06 11:32 ` Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
2026-08-06 5:43 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success for Add gpu_buddy_allocated_addr_to_block helper and its Kunit tests (rev4) Patchwork
2026-08-06 6:20 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2026-08-06 15:15 ` ✗ Xe.CI.FULL: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5675a0ee-a5ee-480e-9a02-b71225c1d86d@intel.com \
--to=matthew.auld@intel.com \
--cc=arunpravin.paneerselvam@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tejas.upadhyay@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.