From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Or Gerlitz Subject: Re: RoCE passive side failures on 4.4-rc5 Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 09:29:40 +0200 Message-ID: <567658E4.6040508@mellanox.com> References: <5672BF85.6080005@mellanox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5672BF85.6080005-VPRAkNaXOzVWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Doug Ledford , Moni Shoua , Matan Barak Cc: linux-rdma , Sagi Grimberg List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On 12/17/2015 3:58 PM, Or Gerlitz wrote: > Using 4.4-rc5+ [1] and **not** applying any of the patches I sent today, > I noted that RoCE passive side isn't working (rdma-cm, ibv_rc_pingpong > works). > > I have two nodes in ConnectX3 VPI config (port1 IB and port2 Eth), the > one with the 4.4-rc5 kernel can act as both (rping) client/server for > IB links but only (rping) client for RoCE. > > I tried both inter-node and loopback runs, in all cases, the client > side getsCM > reject with reason 28, see [2], tried both iser and rping. Eth (ICMP, > TCP) works OK. OK, small progress, when the force Eth link type on my IB port (using mlx4 sysfs), things work. You should be able to reproduce it on your non-VPI systems the other way around, by forcing IB link type on one of the Eth ports and see the failure. I Saw the same behavior with both 4.4-rc2 and 4.4-rc5 Or. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html