From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([59.151.112.132]:10078 "EHLO heian.cn.fujitsu.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751691AbbLWFKI (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Dec 2015 00:10:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] btrfs: Introduce new mount option backuproot to replace recovery To: Christoph Anton Mitterer , References: <1450750596-14627-1-git-send-email-quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> <1450820151.5520.33.camel@scientia.net> From: Qu Wenruo Message-ID: <567A2C9E.7060806@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:09:50 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1450820151.5520.33.camel@scientia.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote on 2015/12/22 22:35 +0100: > On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 10:16 +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote: >> Current "recovery" mount option will only try to use backup root. >> However the word "recovery" is too generic and may be confusing for >> some >> users. > I would rather call it something like "restorebackuproot" or > "usebackuproot",... caues "backuproot" sounds more like *doing* the > action "backup root". Make sense. I'll pick "usebackuproot" for next version. Thanks, Qu > > Cheers, > Chris. >