From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools/libxc: don't send end record if remus fails Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2015 11:11:28 +0000 Message-ID: <5683BBE0.1050006@citrix.com> References: <1451439588-25310-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1451439588-25310-4-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1451439588-25310-4-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Wen Congyang , xen devel Cc: Shriram Rajagopalan , Changlong Xie , Yang Hongyang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 30/12/2015 01:39, Wen Congyang wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper While looking at this code, what about error handling for the postcopy() callback just out of context? > --- > tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c > index cefcef5..76ebb34 100644 > --- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c > +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c > @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int save(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, uint16_t guest_type) > > rc = ctx->save.callbacks->checkpoint(ctx->save.callbacks->data); > if ( rc <= 0 ) > - ctx->save.checkpointed = false; > + goto err; > } > } while ( ctx->save.checkpointed ); >