From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wen Congyang Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] tools/libxc: don't send end record if remus fails Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 08:49:49 +0800 Message-ID: <56847BAD.60603@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <1451439588-25310-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <1451439588-25310-4-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com> <5683BBE0.1050006@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <5683BBE0.1050006@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Andrew Cooper , xen devel Cc: Shriram Rajagopalan , Changlong Xie , Yang Hongyang List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 12/30/2015 07:11 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 30/12/2015 01:39, Wen Congyang wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang > > Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper > > While looking at this code, what about error handling for the postcopy() callback just out of context? We don't handle it now. IIRC, migration v1 doesn't handle it to. I think we should handle it. Thanks Wen Congyang > >> --- >> tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c >> index cefcef5..76ebb34 100644 >> --- a/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c >> +++ b/tools/libxc/xc_sr_save.c >> @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static int save(struct xc_sr_context *ctx, uint16_t guest_type) >> rc = ctx->save.callbacks->checkpoint(ctx->save.callbacks->data); >> if ( rc <= 0 ) >> - ctx->save.checkpointed = false; >> + goto err; >> } >> } while ( ctx->save.checkpointed ); >> > > > > . >