Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] x86/xen/time: setup vcpu 0 time info page

[Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>]

On 01/04/2016 04:07 PM, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> On 12/28/2015 04:52 PM, Joao Martins wrote:
>> +
>> +static int xen_setup_vsyscall_time_info(int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info *ti;
>> +	struct vcpu_register_time_memory_area t;
>> +	struct pvclock_vcpu_time_info *pvti;
>> +	unsigned long mem;
>> +	int ret, size;
>> +	u8 flags;
>> +
>> +	ret = HYPERVISOR_vcpu_op(VCPUOP_register_vcpu_time_memory_area,
>> +				 cpu, NULL);
>> +	if (ret == -ENOSYS) {
>> +		pr_debug("xen: vcpu_time_info placement not supported\n");
>> +		return -ENOTSUPP;
>> +	}
> 
> I don't think this is necessary.
> 
OK, I will remove it.

>> +
>> +	size = PAGE_ALIGN(sizeof(struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info));
>> +	mem = memblock_alloc(size, PAGE_SIZE);
>> +	if (!mem)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	ti = __va(mem);
>> +	memset(ti, 0, size);
> 
> Can you just use get_zeroed_page()? (struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info 
> is always less than a page, isn't it?).
Yeah, I can use get_zeroed_page() (struct pvclock_vsyscall_time_info is always
less than a page).

Additionally perhaps this region shouldn't be freed if PVCLOCK_TSC_STABLE_BIT
isn't supported, because otherwise I would end up corrupting data elsewhere
since the pvti would still be periodically updated by Xen, right?

> 
> 
> -boris
>