From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Cooper Subject: Re: RFC Userspace hypercalls Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 16:38:10 +0000 Message-ID: <568D42F2.6070900@citrix.com> References: <568CFE3A.8080505@citrix.com> <568D2F4002000078000C3F7E@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> <568D2860.3010807@citrix.com> <568D4F6502000078000C418C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <568D4F6502000078000C418C@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: Tim Deegan , Keir Fraser , Xen-devel List List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/01/16 16:31, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 06.01.16 at 15:44, wrote: >> We did have an internal request for an HVM guest userspace netfront >> driver to be able to use evntchnop calls directly. > And this can't be accomplished using the evtchn and/or privcmd > drivers? It can, and I don't believe the worry about extra overhead is well placed. (There many areas of lower hanging fruit in this specific case). However, a userspace backend isn't in principle a bad idea. ~Andrew