From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juergen Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/13] xenstore: make use of the "xenstore domain" flag Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 07:36:43 +0100 Message-ID: <568E077B.7080102@suse.com> References: <1450444471-6454-1-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1450444471-6454-10-git-send-email-jgross@suse.com> <1452097405.21055.108.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1452097405.21055.108.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org, ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com, stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, wei.liu2@citrix.com, dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On 06/01/16 17:23, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 14:14 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote: >> Create the xenstore domain with the xs_domain flag specified. This >> enables us to test whether such a domain is already running before >> we create it. As there ought to be only one xenstore in the system >> we don't need to start another one. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross >> --- >> tools/helpers/init-xenstore-domain.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/tools/helpers/init-xenstore-domain.c b/tools/helpers/init- >> xenstore-domain.c >> index 17f0151..4cd9e0f 100644 >> --- a/tools/helpers/init-xenstore-domain.c >> +++ b/tools/helpers/init-xenstore-domain.c >> @@ -66,7 +66,8 @@ static int build(xc_interface *xch) >> } else { >> ssid = SECINITSID_DOMU; >> } >> - rv = xc_domain_create(xch, ssid, handle, 0, &domid, NULL); >> + rv = xc_domain_create(xch, ssid, handle, XEN_DOMCTL_CDF_xs_domain, >> + &domid, NULL); >> if (rv) { >> fprintf(stderr, "xc_domain_create failed\n"); >> goto err; >> @@ -165,6 +166,21 @@ err: >> return rv; >> } >> >> +static int check_domain(xc_interface *xch) >> +{ >> + xc_dominfo_t info; >> + uint32_t dom; >> + >> + dom = 0; > > You can pretty safely skip dom0 I think? Hmm, yes. > >> + while (xc_domain_getinfo(xch, dom, 1, &info) == 1) { > > Logging errors (i.e. on return < 0) would be nice I think. Okay. Juergen