From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41869) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH7Dd-00087O-BQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 04:50:58 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH7DY-0004ID-9O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 04:50:57 -0500 Received: from [59.151.112.132] (port=11654 helo=heian.cn.fujitsu.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aH7DX-0004Hr-UA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2016 04:50:52 -0500 References: <1452087782-980-1-git-send-email-caoj.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <568E320E.9@redhat.com> From: Cao jin Message-ID: <568E35A7.4060403@cn.fujitsu.com> Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:53:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <568E320E.9@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] SCSI bus: fix to incomplete QOMify List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 01/07/2016 05:38 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 06/01/2016 14:43, Cao jin wrote: [...] > > These functions are called in the data path; changes to use SCSI_BUS() > should come with performance data proving that it doesn't slow down I/O. > > Paolo > I see. I am not familiar with the procedure of scsi i/o performance test, do have some guideline about it? -- Yours Sincerely, Cao jin