From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sagi Grimberg Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] iSER support for remote invalidate Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 17:26:55 +0200 Message-ID: <568E83BF.70606@dev.mellanox.co.il> References: <1449663128-368-1-git-send-email-sagig@mellanox.com> <1450671628.25674.27.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> <20151224101514.GB6438@infradead.org> <567BC782.7090501@dev.mellanox.co.il> <1452105796.26125.28.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1452105796.26125.28.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com> Sender: target-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Sagi Grimberg , linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, Or Gerlitz , Jenny Derzhavetz List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org > FYI, the only conflict as reported in linux-next last week is with nfsd > tree and "IB: merge struct ib_device_attr into struct ib_device" here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-next&m=145155049101826&w=2 > > It looks like there is ongoing discussion this morning wrt rdma + nfsd > trees.. > > Do you still want this series dropped from target-pending/for-next..? Given that the series was modified on top of the CQ API work then it makes better sense yes. Doug will take it. Thanks Nic.