From: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>,
Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/i386: fill in the CENTURY field of the FADT (FACP) ACPI table
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 18:03:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <568E9A4A.7040602@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <568E4ADF.4020808@redhat.com>
On 01/07/16 12:24, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 07/01/2016 12:22, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 07, 2016 at 11:07:46AM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 04/01/2016 18:19, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
>>>> On 12/10/15 19:53, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 10 Dec 2015 18:25:34 +0100
>>>>> Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The ACPI specification (minimally versions 1.0b through 6.0) define
>>>>>> the FADT.CENTURY field as:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The RTC CMOS RAM index to the century of data value (hundred and
>>>>>> thousand year decimals). If this field contains a zero, then the RTC
>>>>>> centenary feature is not supported. If this field has a non-zero
>>>>>> value, then this field contains an index into RTC RAM space that OSPM
>>>>>> can use to program the centenary field.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The x86 targets generate ACPI payload, emulate an RTC
>>>>>> (CONFIG_MC146818RTC), and that RTC supports the "centenary
>>>>>> feature" (see occurrences of RTC_CENTURY in cmos_ioport_write() and
>>>>>> cmos_ioport_read() in "hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c".)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, FADT.CENTURY is left at zero currently:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [06Ch 0108 1] RTC Century Index : 00
>>>>>>
>>>>>> which -- according to analysis done by Ruiyu Ni at Intel -- should
>>>>>> cause Linux and Windows 8+ to think the RTC centenary feature is
>>>>>> unavailable, and cause Windows 7 to (incorrectly) assume that the
>>>>>> offset to use is constant 0x32. (0x32 happens to be the right value
>>>>>> on QEMU, but Windows 7 is wrong to assume anything at all).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Exposing the right nonzero offset in FADT.CENTURY informs Linux and
>>>>>> Windows 8+ about the right capabilities of the hardware, plus it
>>>>>> retrofits our FADT to Windows 7's behavior.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regression tested with the following guests (all UEFI installs):
>>>>>> - i386 Q35: Fedora 21 ("Fedlet" edition)
>>>>>> - x86_64:
>>>>>> - i440fx:
>>>>>> - Fedora 21
>>>>>> - RHEL 6 and 7
>>>>>> - Windows 7 and 10
>>>>>> - Windows Server 2008 R2 and 2012 R2
>>>>>> - Q35:
>>>>>> - Fedora 22
>>>>>> - Windows 8.1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> (supporter:ACPI/SMBIOS)
>>>>>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com> (supporter:ACPI/SMBIOS)
>>>>>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> (maintainer:X86)
>>>>>> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> (maintainer:X86)
>>>>>> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> (maintainer:X86)
>>>>>> Cc: Ruiyu Ni <ruiyu.ni@intel.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 2 ++
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>>>>>> index 95e0c65..c5e6c4b 100644
>>>>>> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>>>>>> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
>>>>>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@
>>>>>> #include "sysemu/tpm.h"
>>>>>> #include "hw/acpi/tpm.h"
>>>>>> #include "sysemu/tpm_backend.h"
>>>>>> +#include "hw/timer/mc146818rtc_regs.h"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /* Supported chipsets: */
>>>>>> #include "hw/acpi/piix4.h"
>>>>>> @@ -334,6 +335,7 @@ static void fadt_setup(AcpiFadtDescriptorRev1
>>>>>> *fadt, AcpiPmInfo *pm) if (max_cpus > 8) {
>>>>>> fadt->flags |= cpu_to_le32(1 <<
>>>>>> ACPI_FADT_F_FORCE_APIC_CLUSTER_MODEL); }
>>>>>> + fadt->century = RTC_CENTURY;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> Can someone please pick up this patch?
>>>
>>> It should probably go in through Michael's tree, but I've queued it too
>>> so that it isn't forgotten.
>>>
>>> Paolo
>>
>> Yes - thanks!
>> I picked this up - should I add your Reviewed-by tag?
>
> Sure!
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>
> Paolo
>
Thanks guys.
Laszlo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-10 17:25 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] hw/i386: fill in the CENTURY field of the FADT (FACP) ACPI table Laszlo Ersek
2015-12-10 18:53 ` Igor Mammedov
2016-01-04 17:19 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-01-07 10:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-07 11:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-01-07 11:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-01-07 17:03 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=568E9A4A.7040602@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=imammedo@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=ruiyu.ni@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.