Re: x86/microcode update on systems without INITRD

[Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>]

On 2016-01-08 13:27, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 01:16:01PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>> But you take the choice away from people like me, who don't need initrd
>> at all. BLK_DEV_INITRD is a superfluous dependency in this case, because
>> microcode update works perfectly well without it.
> 
> Damn, you have a valid point too. I need to think about it...
> 
> ... well, the only thing I can think of right now is to remove the
> dependency on BLK_DEV_INITRD completely - I believe this is what you
> proposed initially Markus - and add a BIG FAT SUGGESTION to Kconfig
> saying that people should strive for enabling early microcode loading if
> possible.
> 
> This is the only way I see we can handle "make oldconfig" without
> BLK_DEV_INITRD and microcode built-in into the kernel cases relatively
> fair.
> 
> Hmmm.
> 
> Or I could hack "oldconfig" to issue that warning... Lemme think about
> it and see how much Michal would scream at me for it. :-)

You can add a conditional comment like this

comment "WARNING: Early microcode loader requires initramfs support"
	depends on MICROCODE && !BLK_DEV_INITRD

and hope that somebody reads it.

Michal